Hello PieterB,
Monday, January 26, 2004, 8:03:45 AM, you wrote:
P> Is there some way to prevent spamassassin from using SA-talk messages
P> for Bayes auto_learning. My bayes filter seems to be less effective
P> since a lot of spamphrases/tokens are discussed on this list.
My method:
1) I subscri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 26 January 2004 08:03 am, PieterB wrote:
> Is there some way to prevent spamassassin from using SA-talk messages
> for Bayes auto_learning. My bayes filter seems to be less effective
> since a lot of spamphrases/tokens are discussed on this l
On Monday, January 26, 2004 @ 8:03:45 AM [-0700], PieterB wrote:
> Is there some way to prevent spamassassin from using SA-talk messages
> for Bayes auto_learning. My bayes filter seems to be less effective
> since a lot of spamphrases/tokens are discussed on this list.
Do you have access to proc
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 05:03:45PM +0100, PieterB is rumored to have said:
>
> Is there some way to prevent spamassassin from using SA-talk messages
> for Bayes auto_learning. My bayes filter seems to be less effective
> since a lot of spamphrases/tokens are discussed on this list.
It depends on
On January 26, 2004 11:03 am, PieterB wrote:
> Is there some way to prevent spamassassin from using SA-talk messages
> for Bayes auto_learning. My bayes filter seems to be less effective
> since a lot of spamphrases/tokens are discussed on this list.
>
> I did a "sa-learn --mbox --forget Mail/spama
On January 14, 2004 12:07 pm, Paul Barbeau wrote:
> Has anyone create a button (or some other way) that i can install on a
> client outlook that will submit the email to the my bayes learning account?
> The current process to "resend the message" is above most of my users and
> button would be much
fritz
---
+ Basta Ikaw Lord
-Original Message-
From: JC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 9:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] bayes learning
Do you have spamassassin running as root? If not, log on as the user that
spamassassin runs as, and t
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 1:22 AM
To: Fritz Mesedilla
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] bayes learning
> debug: bayes: no dbs present, cannot scan:
> /root/.spamassassin/bayes_toks
Have you got the DB_File module installed? You need it for bayes.
expiry atime
Cheers,
fritz
---
+ Basta Ikaw Lord
-Original Message-
From: Casper Gasper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 1:22 AM
To: Fritz Mesedilla
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] bayes learning
> debug: bayes: no dbs present, canno
So amavisd-new does use bayes, you just need to set the perms right?
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 05:22:09PM +, Casper Gasper wrote:
>
> >debug: bayes: no dbs present, cannot scan:
> >/root/.spamassassin/bayes_toks
>
> Have you got the DB_File module installed? You need it for bayes. I
> take
debug: bayes: no dbs present, cannot scan:
/root/.spamassassin/bayes_toks
Have you got the DB_File module installed? You need it for bayes. I
take it you're running Amavisd-new as a non-root user? That user has
to be able to read bayes_toks and bayes_seen. What's your $MYHOME var
set to in
List (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] bayes learning
At 04:31 AM 11/21/2003, Fritz Mesedilla wrote:
>Greetings!
>I would like to know how to find out if bayes learning is working properly.
>I know that spamassassin itself is working for it is able to filter spam.
r=1.27
debug: is spam? score=1.27 required=5 tests=DATE_MISSING,NO_REAL_NAME
It said "debug: bayes: no dbs present, cannot scan: /root/.spamassassin/bayes_toks"
Perhaps it is because I ran it under root? It usually runs by being called from
amavisd-new.
Cheers,
fritz
---
+ Basta Ik
At 04:31 AM 11/21/2003, Fritz Mesedilla wrote:
Greetings!
I would like to know how to find out if bayes learning is working properly.
I know that spamassassin itself is working for it is able to filter spam.
sa-learn --dump
---
This SF.net emai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Keith C. Ivey writes:
> Arlo Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > it would appear from the data im seeing that bayes is learning
> > the to and received headers on mails... obviously this seems a
> > bit redundant and will only add to the size of
I've done a little examination of the Bayes data for my own
site (which hasn't built up to full size yet) to see whether
"To" and "Received" tokens are useful.
"To" tokens that are good spam indicators include "WEBMASTER"
(in all caps) and the username for a nonexistent address which
has appar
Arlo Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it would appear from the data im seeing that bayes is learning
> the to and received headers on mails... obviously this seems a
> bit redundant and will only add to the size of the bayes db,
> without contributing anything (maybe even harming the learning?
On Oct 18, 2003 at 16:20, Arlo Gilbert wrote:
>it would appear from the data im seeing that bayes is learning the to
>and received headers on mails... obviously this seems a bit redundant
>and will only add to the size of the bayes db, without contributing
>anything (maybe even harming the learnin
Jim Ford writes:
>On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 03:09:47PM -0500, Thomas Cameron wrote:
>> If you have one message in the caught-spam folder and run sa-learn on it, it
>> will report it learned from one message. If you leave that message in there
>> and add a second, sa-learn will only learn from the s
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 03:09:47PM -0500, Thomas Cameron wrote:
> If you have one message in the caught-spam folder and run sa-learn on it, it
> will report it learned from one message. If you leave that message in there
> and add a second, sa-learn will only learn from the second, since it's
> al
If you have one message in the caught-spam folder and run sa-learn on it, it
will report it learned from one message. If you leave that message in there
and add a second, sa-learn will only learn from the second, since it's
already read ther first one.
I think.
--
Thomas Cameron, RHCE, CNE, MCSE,
Genchev, Sergei said:
> Does it make any sense to feed Chinese (mostly HTML) E-mail as spam/ham to
> bayes? Would Bayes learn Chinese words as meaningless single-byte "words"?
> Does it matter? Should I try to use UTF-8 locale? Any experiences would be
> greatly appreciated, especially from mail
> First, a big "thank you" to the developers!
>
> Using the bayes learner, starting it with several 100 spams
> and about 1000 hams, and then mainly feeding it spam that
> wasn't caught in the past had a tremendously positive effect here.
> At the momemnt, spamassassin is almost perfect for us.
>
Could you please tell me what this means:
> AWL(4.0 points) AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment
Do you getting points for being on the auto whitelist?
- oliver
Complete (spam tagged) message from Martin Maechler:
> - Start der SpamAssassin Auswertung ---
>
24 matches
Mail list logo
