PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 2:41 PM
To: Fritz Mesedilla; Spamassassin-Talk
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] spam report in headers
To my knowledge amavisd-new is limited to using those headers, it
ignores the verbose ones added by SpamAssassin.
Ryan Moore
--
Perigee.net Corporation
704-
ubject: Re: [SAtalk] spam report in headers
To my knowledge amavisd-new is limited to using those headers, it
ignores the verbose ones added by SpamAssassin.
Ryan Moore
--
Perigee.net Corporation
704-849-8355 (sales)
704-849-8017 (tech)
www.perigee.net
Fritz Mesedilla wrote:
> How does
To my knowledge amavisd-new is limited to using those headers, it
ignores the verbose ones added by SpamAssassin.
Ryan Moore
--
Perigee.net Corporation
704-849-8355 (sales)
704-849-8017 (tech)
www.perigee.net
Fritz Mesedilla wrote:
How does spamassassin include the spam report in the head
dilla; Spamassassin Mailing List (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] spam report in headers
At 12:51 PM 12/4/03 +0800, Fritz Mesedilla wrote:
>How does spamassassin include the spam report in the headers?
>I only get these headers:
You can reconfigure the headers added by SA.. see the "add_header&quo
: [SAtalk] spam report in headers
At 12:51 PM 12/4/03 +0800, Fritz Mesedilla wrote:
>How does spamassassin include the spam report in the headers?
>I only get these headers:
You can reconfigure the headers added by SA.. see the "add_header" config
option and the "TAGS" secti
At 12:51 PM 12/4/03 +0800, Fritz Mesedilla wrote:
How does spamassassin include the spam report in the headers?
I only get these headers:
You can reconfigure the headers added by SA.. see the "add_header" config
option and the "TAGS" section for a list of different items you can insert.
http://a
Roman Katzer said:
> On Monday, January 20, 2003, 21:36:07, you wrote:
>
> > It is pretty trivial, but I wondered if anyone else has yet
> > found that helpful and should it be a suggestion for an enhancement - maybe
> > "report_header_nonspam 1" or something??
>
> Count me in!
> What did you c
ssin-talk-admin@;lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of Vince
| Puzzella
| Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 3:15 PM
| To: Vince Puzzella; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: Re: [SAtalk] spam report in body
|
|
| So, the problem in a nutshell is this ...
|
| SpamAssassin fails to add the spam report to the body (
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Vince Puzzella" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 6:07 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] spam report in body
> Also, defang_mine is set to 0 and the spam consists of HTML. It probably
> has nothing to do with oulook
CTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 5:39 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] spam report in body
> I've come to the conclusion that when SpamAssassin encounters spam
generated
> with MS Outlook (express as well) it fails to include the spam report.
Has
> anyone else noticed similar
I've come to the conclusion that when SpamAssassin encounters spam generated
with MS Outlook (express as well) it fails to include the spam report. Has
anyone else noticed similar behavior? Can someone explain this?
- Original Message -
From: "Vince Puzzella" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EM
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>>are all tests run? Or are tests run until it has "enough" points to be
>>considered spam?
>
>
> By default, all tests are run. There's a short-circuit flag (-S)
> which tells SA to run through all the negatively scored tests, then
> run the positively scored tests unti
On Sat, 13 Jul 2002, Brandon Knitter wrote:
> > > Okay, that makes sense, I see...I thought it listed everything.
> >
> > It can only list what has been reported to it. That being said, Razor2
> > support isn't yet supported.
>
> Oh, so once Razor2 support is added (and I upgrade to that rev
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 03:31:23PM -0700, Brandon Knitter wrote:
> Oh, so once Razor2 support is added (and I upgrade to that rev of course), then
> I'll see the razor score in the report? I guess this bring up a good question:
You'll see the score if the message is in the razor database. :)
>
> > Opps, sorry, hard to search the archives at GC! :) I am archiving in my
> IMAP
> > boxes now, so searching should be much easier! :)
>
> It wasn't meant as an accusation or indictment. I was just noting that I
> noticed the same thing, and asked about it.
Cool! :) Just being a good netiz
On Sat, 13 Jul 2002, Brandon Knitter wrote:
> > > > I recently posted a similar question.
>
> Opps, sorry, hard to search the archives at GC! :) I am archiving in my IMAP
> boxes now, so searching should be much easier! :)
It wasn't meant as an accusation or indictment. I was just noting that
> > > I recently posted a similar question.
Opps, sorry, hard to search the archives at GC! :) I am archiving in my IMAP
boxes now, so searching should be much easier! :)
> > Or maybe Razor just didn't have the spam in its database yet. The report
> > isn't a listing of what SA does, it's a li
On Sat, 13 Jul 2002, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 05:43:29AM -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
> > I recently posted a similar question.
>
> Or maybe Razor just didn't have the spam in its database yet. The report
> isn't a listing of what SA does, it's a listing of what matched.
>
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 05:43:29AM -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
> I recently posted a similar question.
Or maybe Razor just didn't have the spam in its database yet. The report
isn't a listing of what SA does, it's a listing of what matched.
He didn't say anything about Razor2.
--
Randomly Gener
I recently posted a similar question.
If you're running razor 2.x, current versions of SA do not support razor2,
just yet. (I'm in the same quandry). Razor2 support is in CVS, but hasn't
been released, yet.
There has been some talk about putting out a release with razor2 support,
but nothing
20 matches
Mail list logo
