On Sat, 13 Jul 2002, Brandon Knitter wrote: > > > > I recently posted a similar question. > > Opps, sorry, hard to search the archives at GC! :) I am archiving in my IMAP > boxes now, so searching should be much easier! :)
It wasn't meant as an accusation or indictment. I was just noting that I noticed the same thing, and asked about it. > > > Or maybe Razor just didn't have the spam in its database yet. The report > > > isn't a listing of what SA does, it's a listing of what matched. > > Okay, that makes sense, I see...I thought it listed everything. It can only list what has been reported to it. That being said, Razor2 support isn't yet supported. > > > He didn't say anything about Razor2. > > I am using Razor2. Therein lies the problem, at present. > > No, he didn't. That as the reason I asked (and you didn't quote) which > > version of Razor he was running. > > I'm a geek, and like most geeks I like more data more data more data! :) Is > there a way to kick SA into a "verbose report" mode or something? Something > that lists all the modes it did and did not do in the course of it's spam > searching? If not, that's cool, it seems to be doing it's job anyhow! ;-) It lists the checks that resulted in spamminess in the report that gets appended to the spam, or in the headers (depending on how your SA is configured). ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
