> > > I recently posted a similar question. Opps, sorry, hard to search the archives at GC! :) I am archiving in my IMAP boxes now, so searching should be much easier! :)
> > Or maybe Razor just didn't have the spam in its database yet. The report > > isn't a listing of what SA does, it's a listing of what matched. Okay, that makes sense, I see...I thought it listed everything. > > He didn't say anything about Razor2. I am using Razor2. > No, he didn't. That as the reason I asked (and you didn't quote) which > version of Razor he was running. I'm a geek, and like most geeks I like more data more data more data! :) Is there a way to kick SA into a "verbose report" mode or something? Something that lists all the modes it did and did not do in the course of it's spam searching? If not, that's cool, it seems to be doing it's job anyhow! ;-) I did check out the debug mode, but in a normal day-to-day course of action that didn't quite look like what I wanted. I basically amd just looking for stats. Maybe even graph it some day! ;-) Thanks again, and WOW, I don't get spam at all anymore...this rules! :) -- -bk ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
