> > Opps, sorry, hard to search the archives at GC! :) I am archiving in my > IMAP > > boxes now, so searching should be much easier! :) > > It wasn't meant as an accusation or indictment. I was just noting that I > noticed the same thing, and asked about it.
Cool! :) Just being a good netizen and apologizing for my lack of "RTFM" first. I'll try to comb that before I bug ya! ;-) With that said, this thread should be dead! :-D heheeh > > Okay, that makes sense, I see...I thought it listed everything. > > It can only list what has been reported to it. That being said, Razor2 > support isn't yet supported. Oh, so once Razor2 support is added (and I upgrade to that rev of course), then I'll see the razor score in the report? I guess this bring up a good question: are all tests run? Or are tests run until it has "enough" points to be considered spam? I'm assuming that all tests are run as there can tests which subtract point. If that's the case, I wonder if a cool algorithm for determining if the subsequent tests would even have the ability to affect the threshold. Something tell me that at some point it's best to just run them all as trying to figure out the potential is more overhead! ;-) Just a thought, and thinking outloud sometimes spurs ideas. -- -bk ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
