Re: [SAtalk] Re: DCC incidence

Robert Nicholson wrote: > > Is the mail or checksum sent to a DCC server? Checksum. > Could you try this one. It's also low scoring in 2.61 Here's the output I got: Received: from localhost [127.0.0.1] by coll.pair.com with SpamAssassin (2.60 1.212-2003-09-23-exp); Sat, 13 Dec

Re: [SAtalk] Re: DCC incidence

Simon Byrnand wrote: > Just a bit of a "me too" post, I checked my last two days email including > Ham and Spam and checked the hitrate of DCC and RAZOR2 and here were the > results: > > Ham: 0 DCC hits, 1 RAZOR2 hit out of 203 Ham messages. > Spam: 174 DCC hits, 57 RAZOR2 hits out of 242 Spam mes

Re: [SAtalk] Re: DCC incidence

> "Covington, Chris" wrote: >> >> On my site DCC hits approximately 20% of False Positives also (that is, >> of the 1-2% of false positives, 20% have Razor hits), so don't give it >> too much weight. Razor2 is the worse for that (50% of false >> positives)... but I've weighted my scoring according

RE: [SAtalk] Re: DCC incidence

On my site DCC hits approximately 20% of False Positives also (that is, of the 1-2% of false positives, 20% have Razor hits), so don't give it too much weight. Razor2 is the worse for that (50% of false positives)... but I've weighted my scoring accordingly. Chris -

RE: [SAtalk] Re: DCC and razor doc (Was: Why aren't ALL scoresgeneticallyevolved?)

DCC is only in the CVS version at the moment, not yet in the released version. The web page is built from the released version, so DCC isn't covered there yet. If you get the CVS version, a "make" will generate HTML and text files in the "doc" directory; or you can just use "man Mail::SpamAssassin

Re: [SAtalk] Re: DCC and razor doc (Was: Why aren't ALL scores geneticallyevolved?)

Dan Kohn wrote: > Craig, DCC isn't mentioned on > . > > I added the following lines in my .spamassassinrc/user_prefs, but didn't > see how to turn on DCC. DCC support isn't in SA2.20 -- Only in CVS. Grab a nightly release if you're fee

RE: [SAtalk] Re: DCC and razor doc (Was: Why aren't ALL scores geneticallyevolved?)

Craig, DCC isn't mentioned on . I added the following lines in my .spamassassinrc/user_prefs, but didn't see how to turn on DCC. score RCVD_IN_RBL 10 score RCVD_IN_RSS 1 score RCVD_IN_DUL 1 sco

Re: [SAtalk] Re: DCC

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 04 Apr 2002, Daniel Pittman uttered the following: >>> Tony, I've been holding off on DCC until I thought it was a robust >>> enough system to use. I'm still somewhat haunted by Razor's >>> hiccuppiness in days gone by. In your experience is

Re: [SAtalk] Re: DCC

Ok, sounds like it's worth taking a look at in 2.3 C On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 04:54, Daniel Pittman wrote: > On Thu, 04 Apr 2002, Sean Rima wrote: > Implementing a DCC client system in Perl, grafting that into > SpamAssassin, then enabling it with a configuration parameter to the > SpamAssassin or