Simon Byrnand wrote: > Just a bit of a "me too" post, I checked my last two days email including > Ham and Spam and checked the hitrate of DCC and RAZOR2 and here were the > results: > > Ham: 0 DCC hits, 1 RAZOR2 hit out of 203 Ham messages. > Spam: 174 DCC hits, 57 RAZOR2 hits out of 242 Spam messages. > > And out of the total message sample there weren't any FP's or FN's....
Googling on the topic seems to confirm false positives are not a problem with DCC. > Interesting that DCC is triggering on about 71% of my Spam, far higher > than I might have guessed. Meanwhile RAZOR2 hit on only 23% of Spam. I suppose because DCC is automatic -- I think anyway -- all incomming mail gets reported to DCC server, which checksums, and counts, while the idea with Razor is that the mail is human confirmed spam before submitting -- not sure, but I don't think Razor figures report frequency. > I didn't check the overlap between the two. (Since it requires more than a > simple search/grep and I can't be bothered ;) Well, of course not :). But now that you mention it, I suppose I'll have to figure out how to do that, otherwise, this inferiority complex is gonna get way out of hand. Bryan > Regards, > Simon -- Nothing in the world has more potential for beauty than woman. Nothing has more potential to destroy it, than the world. - (Anonymous) http://www.wecs.com/content.htm This signature file is generated by Pick-a-Tag ! Written by Jeroen van Vaarsel http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=pick-a-tag ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
