On January 09, 2004 04:50 pm, Alan Munday wrote:
> Is anyone finding pyzor reporting a bit hit and miss?
>
> Reporting using:
>
> $ formail -s spamassassin -r < /var/spool/mail/spamtrap
>
> Gave a pyzor error for each of the messages:
>
> Pyzor -> report failed: Exited with non-zero exit code 1
>
>
cember 2003 19:29
To: Alan Munday; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Pyzor
Alan:
Do you find any value running Pyzor? I gave up on it long ago, as it never
seemed to hit on any quantity of Spam.
BTW: I normally test things by doing a sp
ber 16, 2003 5:22 AM
| To: 'Martin, Jeremy'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Pyzor
|
| Martin
|
| Thanks... Found it.
|
| I'm calling spamassassin from a script file driving anomy
| (from the Advosys postfix/spamassassin/anomy howto)
|
| That was using -L which I'
Running spamassassin rather than spamd at the moment.
Enabled with use_pyzor 1 in my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
Alan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MIKE
YRABEDRA
Sent: 16 December 2003 10:47
To: SPAMASSASSIN
Subject: Re: [SAtalk
in,
Jeremy
Sent: 16 December 2003 11:00
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Pyzor
I don't see a -t in "man spamd" with SA 2.61. -L enables local tests only -
the manpage says it disables DNS tests only but it also seems to
on 12/16/03 5:59 AM, Martin, Jeremy at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I don't see a -t in "man spamd" with SA 2.61. -L enables local tests only -
> the manpage says it disables DNS tests only but it also seems to disable
> Pyzor/Razor2/etc.
Yes, you right, it's too early here ;-)
Just make sure you
Running spamassassin rather than spamd at the moment.
Enabled with use_pyzor 1 in my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
Alan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MIKE
YRABEDRA
Sent: 16 December 2003 10:47
To: SPAMASSASSIN
Subject: Re: [SAtalk
I don't see a -t in "man spamd" with SA 2.61. -L enables local tests only - the
manpage says it disables DNS tests only but it also seems to disable Pyzor/Razor2/etc.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert
on 12/16/03 5:36 AM, Alan Munday at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> I installed Pyzor last night (0.4.0 on SA 2.60)
>
> All seems well. I can run it from the command line, have done the discover
> and checked with Spamassassin -D (as root and the mail user) which detected
> pyzor and reported the mail
At 01:38 20/11/2003 +0100, Mark wrote:
Has anyone else problems with Pyzor? I am getting these, all throughout the
day,
Pyzor: couldn't grok response "66.250.40.33:24441 TimeoutError: "
I did a "/usr/local/bin/pyzor discover", but to no avail. And I do not have
them blocked on the firewall either.
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Geordon VanTassle wrote:
> Hello spamassassin-talk,
>
> I'm moderately new to SA, and completely new to Pyzor and DCC.
> I've installed Py and DCC per the instructions (I think. Not getting any
> errors, anyway) and I have set SA to add DCC and Pyzor headers, but I'm
>
> -Original Message-
> how sucessfull is pyzor in detecting spam? Any experiences?
> I'm alread
> using razor, which works quite nice. Would I get better results using
> pyzor instead or should I use a combination of both?
I've been using SA w/Pyzor for about 2 months now with ~600 or s
Hi Marcus,
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus Schopen
> how sucessfull is pyzor in detecting spam? Any experiences?
> I'm alread using razor, which works quite nice. Would I get better
> results using pyzor instead or should I use a combination of both?
I can't remember who, but I beli
Hi,
I had a similar problem when I installed pyzor.
In my case, I am running spamd with a spamd user with its $HOME dir set
to /var/lib/spamassassin.
The only way to solve this was to set -H /var/lib/spamassassin/ in the
line I call spamd in my initscript.
I think that the cause of this is that s
- Original Message -
From: "mikea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "SA List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Pyzor not working?
> It appears to me (I could be wrong) that SA is trying to check the
> mail a
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 12:13:03AM +0200, Jim Knuth wrote:
> Hi, what mean this?
> This is the output from "spamassassin -lint -D < sample-spam.txt"
>
>
> debug: executable for pyzor was found at /usr/bin/pyzor
> debug: Pyzor is available: /usr/bin/pyzor
> debug: entering helper-app run mode
> de
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 08:10:48PM -0800, Mark Miksis wrote:
> I've seen this asked a few times, but haven't found an answer that works
> for me. spamassassin -D says:
It's a bug (#1559 actually): http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1559
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"There's
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 09:44:46AM -0500, Smart, Dan wrote:
> Great suggestion. Not sure why my paths went haywire, but I added:
> |> debug: DCC is not available: dccproc not found
> |> debug: Pyzor is not available: pyzor not found
> |>
> |> What could have happened? I didn't mess with either p
> "IA" == Ives Aerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
IA> After upgrading to 2.42, I get a lot less (actually none so far) false
IA> positives but I do get more false negatives. To do something about
IA> that, I thought of adding pyzor, dcc or razor2 to my installation. Any
IA> suggestions as to wh
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 05:39:35PM +0200, Ives Aerts wrote:
> After upgrading to 2.42, I get a lot less (actually none so far) false
> positives but I do get more false negatives. To do something about
> that, I thought of adding pyzor, dcc or razor2 to my installation. Any
> suggestions as to whic
Dinter [mailto:felicity@;kluge.net]
|Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 6:32 PM
|To: Smart, Dan
|Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Pyzor & DCC not found
|
|
|On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 01:59:53PM -0500, Smart, Dan wrote:
|> debug: DCC is not available: dccproc not found
|> debug: Pyzor is not avai
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 01:59:53PM -0500, Smart, Dan wrote:
> debug: DCC is not available: dccproc not found
> debug: Pyzor is not available: pyzor not found
>
> What could have happened? I didn't mess with either pyzor or dcc today. I
> did load the 2.20 Razor, which is working great! Could t
Classification: PUBLIC
I tried back revving to Razor 2.14. This didn't make a difference.
Not sure what to do next.
<>
|-Original Message-
|From: Smart, Dan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 2:00 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: [SAtalk] Pyzor & DCC not
t, Dan
|Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Pyzor not loading
|
|
|On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Dan Smart said:
|> ImportError: No module named distutils.core
|>
|> I've loaded a current copy of python 2 (Python 1 is still loaded)
|>
|> [root@lewis pyzor-0.4.0]# rpm -q python2
|
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Dan Smart said:
> ImportError: No module named distutils.core
>
> I've loaded a current copy of python 2 (Python 1 is still loaded)
>
> [root@lewis pyzor-0.4.0]# rpm -q python2
> python2-2.2.1-1
> [root@lewis pyzor-0.4.0]# rpm -q python2-tools
> python2-tools-2.2.1-1
> [root@
25 matches
Mail list logo
