On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Kelsey Cummings wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 09:14:18AM +, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> > I'm not sure how Vipul is going to do this (I don't follow the Razor list
> > since Razor is so unreliable that we don't use it). I spent a week
> > investigating Nilsimsa, even wrote a
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 09:14:18AM +, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> I'm not sure how Vipul is going to do this (I don't follow the Razor list
> since Razor is so unreliable that we don't use it). I spent a week
> investigating Nilsimsa, even wrote a perl module for it (which I may
> release if I get
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 01:20:46PM -0800, Scott Doty wrote:
>
> I wasn't aware that nilsimsa required one to check against all the
> hashes in the database. I take it there's no way to index the hashes
> to speed up matches? (e.g., maybe only check hashes that have approximately
> the same numb
This relates to what's been discussed on the razor & dcc issue. I may
provide people in this list an idea of where Vipul's going since someone
mentioned that they weren't certain on the project status for razor.
-Original Message-
From: Vipul Ved Prakash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 09:14:18AM +, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Scott Doty wrote:
> > One of our senior system administrators, Kelsey, has had contact with Vipul
> > -- I understand Vipul is working on incorporating "fuzzy" hashes into Razor
> > using the nilsimsa algorithm.
On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Scott Doty wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 02:29:14PM -0500, Rose, Bobby wrote:
> > I've perused the razor list archives and my take is that they will
> > release the server daemon once they deal with the trust issues. They
> > don't want to have spammers setup a server and
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 11:59:26AM -0800, Scott Doty wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 02:29:14PM -0500, Rose, Bobby wrote:
> > I've perused the razor list archives and my take is that they will
> > release the server daemon once they deal with the trust issues. They
> > don't want to have spammer
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 02:29:14PM -0500, Rose, Bobby wrote:
> I've perused the razor list archives and my take is that they will
> release the server daemon once they deal with the trust issues. They
> don't want to have spammers setup a server and go thru and delete all
> the hashes from the da
7;m doing to see how
many more spams trigger a razor score to see if it does make a
difference.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Rogers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 1:04 PM
To: Craig Hughes
Cc: Daniel Quinlan; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Distributed Checks
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 10:26:49PM -0800, Craig Hughes wrote:
> I also think DCC is possibly more promising than razor -- last time I looked
> at it (increasingly long time ago now) DCC looked a bit immature though.
> Stick a feature request in bugzilla though and I'll take a look again soon.
I,
I also think DCC is possibly more promising than razor -- last time I looked
at it (increasingly long time ago now) DCC looked a bit immature though.
Stick a feature request in bugzilla though and I'll take a look again soon.
C
On 3/1/02 10:17 PM, "Daniel Quinlan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I
11 matches
Mail list logo
