I've perused the razor list archives and my take is that they will release the server daemon once they deal with the trust issues. They don't want to have spammers setup a server and go thru and delete all the hashes from the database.
Besides what difference does it make. If you are using Spamassassin, listed in razor is only a score of 3. Also, I'm seeing spam messages with unique lines at the tail of the message body which would generate it's own unique hash. The unique line is also the id in the To field. So it may not even pay to register these though I'm doing to see how many more spams trigger a razor score to see if it does make a difference. -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Rogers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 1:04 PM To: Craig Hughes Cc: Daniel Quinlan; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Distributed Checksum Clearinghouse On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 10:26:49PM -0800, Craig Hughes wrote: > I also think DCC is possibly more promising than razor -- last time I > looked at it (increasingly long time ago now) DCC looked a bit > immature though. Stick a feature request in bugzilla though and I'll > take a look again soon. I, for one, have a major problem with the unavailability of the razor server. If I could run my own server, I'd be interested, but as it stands, their servers are too unreliable for use in a mission-critical environment. Dan. _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
