On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 11:59:26AM -0800, Scott Doty wrote: > On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 02:29:14PM -0500, Rose, Bobby wrote: > > I've perused the razor list archives and my take is that they will > > release the server daemon once they deal with the trust issues. They > > don't want to have spammers setup a server and go thru and delete all > > the hashes from the database. > > > > Besides what difference does it make. If you are using Spamassassin, > > listed in razor is only a score of 3. Also, I'm seeing spam messages > > with unique lines at the tail of the message body which would generate > > it's own unique hash. The unique line is also the id in the To field. > > So it may not even pay to register these though I'm doing to see how > > many more spams trigger a razor score to see if it does make a > > difference. > > Just a point on the curve... > > While we've had an SA server up for a while, I've personally just started > using SA just last week. Out of 35 spams it's caught, 13 were listed in > Razor, including one that would have otherwise scored under 5. > > One of our senior system administrators, Kelsey, has had contact with Vipul > -- I understand Vipul is working on incorporating "fuzzy" hashes into Razor > using the nilsimsa algorithm. (See http://freshmeat.net/projects/nilsimsa/ > for more information.)
At one point, long ago, Vipul had said something to that affect but I haven't heard from him for a long time. (This was about 6 months or more previous to the /. article.) -- Kelsey Cummings - [EMAIL PROTECTED] sonic.net System Administrator 300 B Street, Ste 101 707.522.1000 (Voice) Santa Rosa, CA 95404 707.547.2199 (Fax) http://www.sonic.net/ Fingerprint = 7F 59 43 1B 44 8A 0D 57 91 08 73 73 7A 48 90 C5 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
