On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 18:37, Matt Kettler wrote:
> The infamous abuse of bug 1589 illustrates the fact that spammers are
> testing against SA with unquestionable clarity. And it's nothing new, they
> were doing it before then too, that's just one of the most dramatic examples.
Yes, they're usi
On 12 Aug 2003, Yorkshire Dave wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 18:37, Matt Kettler wrote:
>
> > The infamous abuse of bug 1589 illustrates the fact that spammers are
> > testing against SA with unquestionable clarity. And it's nothing new, they
> > were doing it before then too, that's just on
> -Original Message-
> From: Yorkshire Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 5:16 PM
> To: spamassassin list
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Testing a newsletter against SA online
>
>
> On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 18:37, Matt Kettler wrote:
>
&g
You and every spammer out there would love to know from a simple web
page what SA would think of their messages... Why don't you just save a
copy of the full message you've received on an outside account and then
spamassassin -tD < testmessage?
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Rickard Ande
At 12:47 PM 8/12/2003 -0400, you wrote:
You and every spammer out there would love to know from a simple web
page what SA would think of their messages... Why don't you just save a
copy of the full message you've received on an outside account and then
spamassassin -tD < testmessage?
Really I don'
At 04:32 PM 8/12/2003 +0200, Rickard Andersson wrote:
Hi folks!
I'm wondering if there is a website where I can test a newsletter that I'm
sending out against SA? I'm interested in know what SA thinks of my
newsletter when it comes to things like headers and content. If there is
such a thing, I wo
At 08:27 PM 8/12/03 -0500, Theodore Heise wrote:
Active effort to circumvent filtering totally contradicts any
spammer's contention that he only sends e-mail to people who are
interested in it.
And you expected anything but?
Of course they don't want to "only send email to people who are
inter
