> -----Original Message----- > From: Yorkshire Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 5:16 PM > To: spamassassin list > Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Testing a newsletter against SA online > > > On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 18:37, Matt Kettler wrote: > > > The infamous abuse of bug 1589 illustrates the fact that > spammers are > > testing against SA with unquestionable clarity. And it's > nothing new, they > > were doing it before then too, that's just one of the most > dramatic examples. > > > Yes, they're using SA, at least one of them has checked out the > non-standard rules on Chris Santierre's page as well. > > Hey spammer, I know you're reading this, the header was first, the > listwashing token is next, give it up, you can't win. > > -- > Yorkshire Dave >
LOL, we knew that would happen. Not a problem. I need to get back to my own rules and using some of the great ones that have been submitted myself. Just no time. The more they try to circumvent our rules, the stupider the spam looks. Many users see the random letters in subjects and just delete. Now that we can tag these random characters, what are they going to do next? You have to love the opt out clause of "want no more of this shit..." Well hell, that company has to be reputible with lanquage like that. Lets purchase their products ;) Chris Santerre System Admin and SA Custom Rules Emporium keeper http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/sa_rules.htm "A little nonsense now and then, is relished by the wisest men." - Willy Wonka ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
