On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 08:21:22PM -0700, Vicki Brown wrote:
> My local tests (defined in ~/spamassassin/user_prefs) are not being run.
>
> In my ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs I have several tests, including this one:
>
> header CF_SUB_UID Subject =~ /vlb|Vicki/i
> describe CF_SUB_UID
I lost all list mail for Saturday August 9; if anyone has an idea, it didn't
reach my mailbox.
Trying again. Someone must have a hint abut what's going wrong.
This problem Should Not Be Occurring.
My local tests (defined in ~/spamassassin/user_prefs) are not being run.
These tests were run when
Matt Kettler writes:
> They do fail to directly mention that report_header and defang_mime are
> deprecated, but that note being directly addressed to users of versions
> older than 2.50 should be enough to suggest reading up on the report_safe
> option.
>
> I would agree however that it would
At 00:57 -0400 2003-08-07, Matt Kettler wrote:
>By default user rules will be ignored in user_prefs if you use spamd/spamc.
I don't use either.
>This is done to prevent security exploits.
Is this new in 2.55? (new since 2.43)? Or did this file get overwritten for
me when I upgraded?
>
>See the "
> -Original Message-
> From: Vicki Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2003 2:45 AM
> To: Robert Menschel
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] user_prefs file - local rules not being used
>
>
> At 21:11 -0700 2003-0
Chris Santerre writes:
> Good point. There was a ton of threads about this when 2.55 came out.
> However a lot of people are still running 2.4x and waiting for 2.60. So this
> upgrade from 2.4x question will be popping up again.
>
> Any chance the devs could throw a quick bit about this in the 2
At 11:45 PM 8/9/2003 -0700, Vicki Brown wrote:
Anyone now using 2.4* with options report_header or defang_mime should be
wary if you "upgrade".
Apparently these were both rolled into the new "report_safe feature", except
the README fails to mention this.
Actually the very first lines of the README
At 11:13 -0400 2003-08-11, Matt Kettler wrote:
>At 11:45 PM 8/9/2003 -0700, Vicki Brown wrote:
>>Anyone now using 2.4* with options report_header or defang_mime should be
>>wary if you "upgrade".
>>Apparently these were both rolled into the new "report_safe feature", except
>>the README fails to me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Vicki,
Saturday, August 9, 2003, 8:21:22 PM, you wrote:
VB> My local tests (defined in ~/spamassassin/user_prefs) are not being
VB> run.
VB> My reading of Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf indicates that tests defined
VB> in ~/spamassassin/user_prefs
By default user rules will be ignored in user_prefs if you use spamd/spamc.
This is done to prevent security exploits.
See the "allow_user_rules" option in man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf.
Either turn that on, or put custom rules only in local.cf.
At 21:11 -0700 2003-08-09, Robert Menschel wrote:
>>Vicki -- can you add a -D debugging parameter to your SA call from within
>procmail?
It turned out to be easiest to run this on the command line as the results
are many (and most not helpful... to me... I'm sure they're helpful to
somebody)
>The
At 00:57 -0400 2003-08-07, Matt Kettler wrote:
>See the "allow_user_rules" option in man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf.
>
>Either turn that on, or put custom rules only in local.cf.
Turned on allow_user_rules 1 in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf - that didn't
help.
Further reading of the docs more clos
At 08:21 PM 8/9/03 -0700, Vicki Brown wrote:
My local tests (defined in ~/spamassassin/user_prefs) are not being run.
These tests were run when we used SpamAssassin 2.43. Now we have upgraded to
2.55 and the tests are not being run.
Read the manpage.. this is disabled by default in 2.55 for secur
I upgraded to SpamAssassin 2.55. I just realized that mail seems to be
skipping over my local rules as defined in $HOME/.spamassassin/user_prefs.
For example, I have these rules defined (they used to work)
header CF_SUB_UID Subject =~ /vlb|Vicki/i
describe CF_SUB_UID Sub
14 matches
Mail list logo
