w Kohlsmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Thomas Hurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] suggestion don't put * * * S P A M * * * in subject
>
> > That also encourages proper filtering rather than the breaindead method
> > of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Friday, 1. March 2002 19:13 schrieben Sie:
> > That also encourages proper filtering rather than the breaindead method
> > of matching on subject.
> Many email clients cannot filter on aribitrary hea
> That also encourages proper filtering rather than the breaindead method
> of matching on subject.
Many email clients cannot filter on aribitrary headers. KMail, for example
(yes this is a corner case) does not let you define which header to watch; it
has a list of commonly-used ones. I'm su
* Rob McMillin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I think he meant that he didn't want to see the *** SPAM *** tag
> appear in the Subject: line. What he needs to do is add
>
> rewrite_subject 0
>
> in his user preferences, or the global prefs if he wants this change
> system-wide (which I gather is th
Charlie Watts wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
On Fri, 1 Mar 2002, Sjaak Nabuurs VSM-Hosting.nl wrote:
I suggest to user in this list do not put ***SPAM*** in the subjectline.I drop thes in a different map in my mail program and i think many otherusers.
Don't filter based on the sub
On Fri, 1 Mar 2002, Sjaak Nabuurs VSM-Hosting.nl wrote:
> I suggest to user in this list do not put ***SPAM*** in the subject
> line.
>
> I drop thes in a different map in my mail program and i think many other
> users.
Don't filter based on the subject line.
Filter on the X-Spam-Status header.
Hi
I suggest to user in this list do not put
***SPAM*** in the subject line.
I drop thes in a different map in my mail
program and i think many other users.
Thanks
Sjaak
