11:58
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] sudden roll of FNs
On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 04:25:00PM +0300, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
> I have attached a few of them here. If anyone has any suggestions,
> I'm more than happy to hear them.
If I were you, I'd train the Bayes classi
I've also noticed a couple of FNs per day lately. All but one of the messages you sent
scored over 5 points on my box. I'm running a CVS version of SA that's a few weeks
old. Make sure that whatever mechanism you're using to run SA (procmail?) is doing
it's job, and that the server isn't being o
On 08/11/03 12:33 PM, Giles Coochey sat at the `puter and typed:
> You've probably whitelisted [EMAIL PROTECTED] as all these emails
> were sent with a forged From same as the recipient. Nearly all of those
> emails scored high scores with my setup.
That's not the From: header, that's a mail serve
On 08/11/03 05:12 PM, Hannu Liljemark sat at the `puter and typed:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 03:21:00PM +0300, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
>
> > > Most seem to score in BAYES_30 range in your current
> > > environment, but with some training I'm willing to bet you'll see
> > > BAYES_90 for the same mails
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 03:21:00PM +0300, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
> > Most seem to score in BAYES_30 range in your current
> > environment, but with some training I'm willing to bet you'll see
> > BAYES_90 for the same mails.
>
> Always. Every day, I archive the spam folder of all the messages
> re
On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 04:25:00PM +0300, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
> I have attached a few of them here. If anyone has any suggestions,
> I'm more than happy to hear them.
If I were you, I'd train the Bayes classifier with these mails that
sneaked past. Most seem to score in BAYES_30 range in your c
On 08/11/03 01:57 PM, Hannu Liljemark sat at the `puter and typed:
> On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 04:25:00PM +0300, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
>
> > I have attached a few of them here. If anyone has any suggestions,
> > I'm more than happy to hear them.
>
> If I were you, I'd train the Bayes classifier wit
Hey everyone. Sorry if this has come up recently - I just got back on
the list.
I unsubscribed several months ago, shortly after upgrading to 2.55
because I was receiving *maybe* 1 FN every month. Not bad since I got
an average of 30 or 40 spams/day, and haven't has a single FP since
upgrading.
Hey everyone. Sorry if this has come up recently - I just got back on
the list.
I unsubscribed several months ago, shortly after upgrading to 2.55
because I was receiving *maybe* 1 FN every month. Not bad since I got
an average of 30 or 40 spams/day, and haven't has a single FP since
upgrading.
