You've probably whitelisted [EMAIL PROTECTED] as all these emails were sent with a forged From same as the recipient. Nearly all of those emails scored high scores with my setup.
Thanks Giles -----Original Message----- From: Hannu Liljemark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 August 2003 11:58 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] sudden roll of FNs On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 04:25:00PM +0300, Louis LeBlanc wrote: > I have attached a few of them here. If anyone has any suggestions, > I'm more than happy to hear them. If I were you, I'd train the Bayes classifier with these mails that sneaked past. Most seem to score in BAYES_30 range in your current environment, but with some training I'm willing to bet you'll see BAYES_90 for the same mails. Other things to consider would be Razor, DCC or Pyzor. Here most of the spammails you attached can be found from Razor's DB. I don't use others so can't say what DCC or Pyzor would say. Also RBL testing wouldn't hurt, as all those sample spams came from known open proxies. -- (Mr.) Hannu Liljemark | Appelsiini Finland Oy | http://appelsiini.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01 /01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
