On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 03:21:00PM +0300, Louis LeBlanc wrote: > > Most seem to score in BAYES_30 range in your current > > environment, but with some training I'm willing to bet you'll see > > BAYES_90 for the same mails. > > Always. Every day, I archive the spam folder of all the messages > received the previous day.
Okay, sounds good. I just thought it was weird to see the spams matching BAYES_30 with your bayes db when here (with whatever tokens the db holds currently, without sa-learn'ing your samples) the mails hit BAYES_90. > I use Razor and whatever else SA checks by default. Though I often > see messages that were flagged as probably spam by one DSBL or > another, but still fall under the 5.0 mark. Maybe the proxies were added to the RBLs very recently and weren't there the moment you got the mails. And same with Razor; perhaps the checksums for those mails weren't listed yet. Anyways with 2.55 the mails score high (I have added around +1 to bunch of RBL tests, Razor and BAYES_90 scoring, though). -- (Mr.) Hannu Liljemark | Appelsiini Finland Oy | http://appelsiini.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
