On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 07:28:10PM -0500, Tom Allison wrote:
> What ever happened to spamproxyd?
I don't know much about it, but the code is still there in 2.50.
> Is it still supported?
I assume...
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"Even my usual 'careful' is not very careful by other peoples
What ever happened to spamproxyd?
I am having a little trouble finding any "activity" on it.
Is it still supported?
--
"All language designers are arrogant. Goes with the territory..."
(By Larry Wall)
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
Tom,
| I was looking around for something that would work as an advanced
| filter under postfix. I've had recommendations for amavisd and
| found some "stuff" on spamproxyd.
|
| How is this related to SpamAssassin? spamproxyd and a lot of
| people here have mentioned amavis so I'll guess this
I was looking around for something that would work as an advanced
filter under postfix.
I've had recommendations for amavisd and found some "stuff" on
spamproxyd.
How is this related to SpamAssassin? spamproxyd and a lot of
people here have mentioned amavis so I'll guess this is a wealth
of i
Hi All,
I am running FreeBSD 4.4 and have SpamAssassin 2.20 installed.
I prefer sendmail as my mailer and am attempting to configure
a spam proxy mailer using spamproxyd.
However, no matter which way I invoke the spamproxyd,
it always returns the syntax. Except when I only include
the src:prt dst
File a bugzilla ticket on it, and attach the patch, then assign the
ticket to me.
C
On Tue, 2002-04-02 at 10:12, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Jim Holmes wrote:
>
> > --On Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:21 AM -0400 "Marc G. Fournier"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Jus
On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Jim Holmes wrote:
> --On Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:21 AM -0400 "Marc G. Fournier"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Just curious, but in 2.11, spamproxyd requires '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' to
> > be set, or it won't run ... with it set, all messages triggered as SPAM go
> > to
--On Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:21 AM -0400 "Marc G. Fournier"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just curious, but in 2.11, spamproxyd requires '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' to
> be set, or it won't run ... with it set, all messages triggered as SPAM go
> to a central address, which, IMHO, is "A Bad Thing" ..
Just curious, but in 2.11, spamproxyd requires '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' to
be set, or it won't run ... with it set, all messages triggered as SPAM go
to a central address, which, IMHO, is "A Bad Thing" ...
Has anyone looked at changing:
my $status = $spamtest->check($mail);
if ($status->is_s
> -Original Message-
> From: Maurits Bloos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 20 March 2002 16:52
> To: 'Greg Ward'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] spamproxyd : 'sending spam to a
> spamtrap box & the
> i ntended recip ient'
>
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: woensdag 20 maart 2002 17:43
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] spamproxyd : 'sending spam to a
> spamtrap box & the
> intended recip ient'
>
>
> O
On 20 March 2002, Maurits Bloos said:
> Has anyone 'hacked' spamproxyd to send *SPAM* to both the intended recipient
> and to a 'spamtrap' mailbox ?
Why bother? I thought the point of spamproxyd was to allow rejecting
spam at SMTP-time. If you're just going to accept it anyways, then use
your r
Hi All,
Has anyone 'hacked' spamproxyd to send *SPAM* to both the intended recipient
and to a 'spamtrap' mailbox ?
Currently I hacked spamproxyd to send it to the intended recipient, but it
would help if a copy would go to a spamtrap mailbox where I can see if the
mails are 'really' spam or fals
$recips = \@recipients;
} else {
$recips = $client->{TO};
}
change :
@recipients = ("$spamaddr");
to
$recips = $client->{TO};
That should fix it :-)
> -Original Message-
> From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: dinsdag 19 maart 2002
requiers a 'reporting address' to send the spam to ... which, from what
I've been able to tell, prevents it from being delivered to the original
recipient if marked as spam ...
am I missing something? I want the email to be sent to the recipient, I
just want them to know that it is spam, or, at
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 10:30:55PM +0100, Cyril Chaboisseau wrote:
> hi,
>
> I just setup a mail relay using postfix w/ spamassassin 2.1 via
> spamproxyd
> (I couldn't use procmail because the transport map takes precedence over
> mailbox_command=/usr/bin/procmail)
>
>
> but I still have some q
hi,
I just setup a mail relay using postfix w/ spamassassin 2.1 via
spamproxyd
(I couldn't use procmail because the transport map takes precedence over
mailbox_command=/usr/bin/procmail)
but I still have some questions :
- how spamproxyd is supposed to start ? (/etc/init.d/... ? manually ?)
->
Has anyone setup spamproxyd with Exim 4 or 3.35
Sean
--
BBS and Fidonet News Portal at http://www.tcob1.net
Offering feeds for Fidonet, Adventurenet, and many other nets
See http://www.tcob1.net for more details
ICQ: 679813 Linux User: 231986 TCOB1 BBS: 095 43852 Yahoo: tcob_1
__
Morning all ...
I think I've set everythign up right ... fixed the Mail::Audit
issue as recommended on the list, manually run /usr/local/bin/spamproxyd
from the command line, then change main.cf to add:
content_filter = smtp:localhost:10025
and master.cf to add:
localhost:1002
Hi folks. I'm new to this list, so break me in gently...
I did a search in the archives for the problem I am having and only had one
hit: someone asked the same question I'm about to ask, and it doesn't look
like he got a reply. At least, it wasn't a reply that hit the list. So,
here goes:
U
20 matches
Mail list logo
