On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, Raquel Rice wrote:
> I've tried several times to run spamc from a site-wide procmailrc.
> It just hangs. This is what I have in the /etc/procmailrc:
>
> :0fw
> * < 256000
> | spamc
>
> and I've made certain to have started spamd.
You don't say how
Hi,
I have been running some performance tests on spamc/spamd and I wanted to make sure my
results were consistent with expected performance. All tests were run on:
Dual 2.8 Ghz Xeon (4 logical CPUs) box w/2GB RAM
Redhat 8.0, Spam Assassin 2.60
I've been using the spamc/spamd combination.
Hi,
I have been running some performance tests on spamc/spamd and I wanted to make sure my
results were consistent with expected performance. All tests were run on:
Dual 2.8 Ghz Xeon (4 logical CPUs) box w/2GB RAM
Redhat 8.0, Spam Assassin 2.60
I've been using the spamc/spamd combination.
to run as qmailq.
-Jeremy
-Original Message-
From: AltGrendel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 8:19 AM
To: SA-Talk
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] spamc/spamd question on a qmail gateway
On Sat, 2003-08-23 at 04:44, Joe Cave wrote:
> Dear list,
> I'm having some p
On Sat, 2003-08-23 at 04:44, Joe Cave wrote:
> Dear list,
> I'm having some problems getting spamc/spamd working on a qmail gateway. I'm
> wondering what is the most lightweight way to get mail scanned and then re-injected
> back into the qmail-queue? I have qmail patched to work with the QMAILQU
Dear list,
I'm having some problems getting spamc/spamd working on a qmail gateway. I'm wondering
what is the most lightweight way to get mail scanned and then re-injected back into
the qmail-queue? I have qmail patched to work with the QMAILQUEUE variable. If I point
my QMAILQUEUE to spamc noth
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Sill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:17 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] spamc/spamd not checking all messages
>
> I use:
>
> #!/bin/sh
>
> exec /usr/local/bin/softli
"Dallas L. Engelken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Dave Sill wrote:
>>
>> What's happening is that some spam (~5-10/day out of 60-70)
>> is not being checked correctly by spamd. For example, an
>> obvious spam contains the header field:
>>
>> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 required=0
>
> why not ru
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Sill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 8:03 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] spamc/spamd not checking all messages
>
>
> I'm using 2.55 under Red Hat 8 and qmail with qmail-scanner-1
On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 09:02, Dave Sill wrote:
> I'm using 2.55 under Red Hat 8 and qmail with qmail-scanner-1.16. I
> *think* this problem started when I upgraded to 2.55 from 2.50, but
> I'm not sure. I'm using nearly the same configuration at home and not
> seeing this problem.
>
> What's happen
I'm using 2.55 under Red Hat 8 and qmail with qmail-scanner-1.16. I
*think* this problem started when I upgraded to 2.55 from 2.50, but
I'm not sure. I'm using nearly the same configuration at home and not
seeing this problem.
What's happening is that some spam (~5-10/day out of 60-70) is not
bein
Hi,
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 10:26:28 +0200 Buscema Guido
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to set up spamc/spamd with postfix by piping a shell script
> inside master.cf file of postfix.
> I created a user "filter" and a directory /var/spool/filter.
> I also created a directory ( /opt/
Hi,
I'm trying to set up spamc/spamd with postfix by piping a shell script
inside master.cf file of postfix.
I created a user "filter" and a directory /var/spool/filter.
I also created a directory ( /opt/spamfilter ) with the following shell
script (filter.sh)
SENDMAIL="/usr/lib/sendmail -i"
SPAM
- Original Message -
From: "Dr. Ongo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Spam Assassin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 11:08 AM
Subject: [SAtalk] spamc/spamd per user config files
> Hello
>
> I'm using the spamc/spamd combo wi
Hello
I'm using the spamc/spamd combo with postfix as an inbound relay.
Postfix runs spamc as user 'filter' and messages that spamd is changing to
that user can be seen in the log
My reading of "man spamd" that .. "spamd will check per-user config files
for every message"
has lead me to make ent
Stuart Gall wrote:
Where did you get that idea ?
spamc respects the user_prefs and local.cf files.
The only issue might be if you want user based configuration and you are running spamc
as mail or something
but this should be configureable on the MTA.
Oh. The docs (which I don't have in front of
I'm currently using spamc/spamd here to filter the mail. This is a
small place (only about 80 customers), so I was able to run the
mailserver on a P2 450 without problems. When i started running
spamassassin (on a per user basis), the machine started really bogging
down - if only for 5-10 sec
Hello,
I have Spamassassin 2.43 running
on a FreeBSD 4.7-pl2
I had spamc/spamd working
flawlessly on the machine. However, I recently upgraded
to SA 2.43 and since then, spamassassin reports a
spam score of 0.0/$user-setting (where $usersetting is retrieved from an SQL databas
> That's a *huge* difference. It shouldn't be my internet connection as it
> is pretty good.
>
> I have seen other posts mentioning really slow times. Any thoughts?
I have the same problem here. I updated from SA 2.31 to 2.43 recently and
installed Razor2 v2.20 in addition (2.31 was working wi
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 01:23:23PM -0800, Kaleb Pederson wrote:
> I have seen other posts mentioning really slow times. Any thoughts?
>
Network timeouts, ie your internet connection is flaky in some way.
---
Lars Hansson
---
This sf.net emai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Kaleb Pederson wrote:
> However, if I use -a -c -L as a parameter I get:
>
> spamd[29034]: [info] setuid to kibab succeeded
> spamd[29034]: [processing message for kibab] 1000,
> expecting 4656 bytes.
> spamd[29034]: [identified
When I run:
$ time spamassassin -t < sample-spam.txt
I get:
real0m32.395s
user0m1.340s
sys 0m0.070s
When I use spamd/spamc I get the following in my log when I do:
$ spamc < sample-spam.txt
spamd[28922]: [info] setuid to kibab succeeded
spamd[28922]: [Created user preferences fil
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 11:23:10AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This leads me to a question. Is there a way to tell SA to ignore (and
> possibly overwrite) all conflicting header lines like X-Spam-Status? That
It does already. SA removed the X-Spam-* headers before scanning.
This actually
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 09:47:52AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > So, why did I get SpamAssassin headers when I didn't have spamd running?
>
> The answer is that it's being scanned elsewhere. For instance, I
> receive mails (currently ~4% of my
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 09:47:52AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> So, why did I get SpamAssassin headers when I didn't have spamd running?
The answer is that it's being scanned elsewhere. For instance, I
receive mails (currently ~4% of my mail per month) that already have a
X-Spam-Status head
So, why did I get SpamAssassin headers when I didn't have spamd running?
Patrick
Original Message
From: Theo Van Dinter
Date: Wed 10/16/02 9:38
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: [SAtalk] spamc && !
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 08:57:32AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It's version 2.42 of SA. When I went back and checked, spamd was not running. So if
> it's spawning a spamd, it's not leaving it hanging around.
spamc does not spawn spamd. spamc tries to connect to the port, if
there's nothing
TECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] spamc && !spamd
What version are you running. I have had somthing like this cripple my
server as EVERY message caused a new spamd to startup (under 1.41) I have
not yet upgraded to 1.42 or even 1.43 i have just seen so i have not seen if
this goes away.
Robin
Hello,
I just installed SpamAssassin. I've told procmail to pipe messages through spamc, but
I was surprised when, before I had a chance to run spamd, messages appeared in my box
with SpamAssassin headers. Does spamc instantiate a spamd process if the daemon isn't
running?
Thanks,
Patrick
--
hrauder
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Spamc/spamd setup with Postfix
>
>
> I guess I forgot to say that it's on a mail-relay, which is
> supposed to scan the mail, and not deliver locally.
>
> So what I basically need, is the way to apply a contentfilte
er works on a mail-gateway.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Schrauder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 7. oktober 2002 22:20
> To: Nicolai Strøm Gylling
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Spamc/spamd setup with Postfix
>
>
> I have it work
virus-scanner works on a mail-gateway.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Schrauder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 7. oktober 2002 22:20
To: Nicolai Strøm Gylling
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Spamc/spamd setup with Postfix
I have it working here, but I am not a linux person and ca
.mydomain.com[192.168.0.7], delay=5, status=sent (250 Message received:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@sw.mydomain.com)
Mike Schrauder
> -Original Message-
> From: Nicolai Strøm Gylling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 11:21 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Su
Hi
I want to setup a Postfix-server with Spamassassin, but so far I havn't had much luck,
by reading the docs, this mailinglist(including archives) and searching the net.
Could anyone provide a working example configuration of postfix and spamassassin
(using spamc/spamd), or link to a howto on
I am still trying to figure out why spam-assassin is not working the way
I expect it to on my system.
I am using sendmail with virtual hosting, procmail for local delivery,
and spamd/spamc. I run freeBSD. I have users with active shell accounts
and users with nonexistent shells and nonexistent
At 07/02/2002 21:24, Kenneth Porter wrote:
>In /etc/procmailrc I have:
>
>:0fw
>| /usr/bin/spamc -u spamd
>
>Before adding the -u to spamc, no processing appeared to happen, and log
>
>What's the right way to get per-user configs in this setup?
I believe you can fix this by addding
DROPPR
I'm running spamc/spamd on Red Hat 7.2 from the 2.20 RPM. (Just finished
building 2.31 and will update shortly.)
The spamd command line, taken from the initscript, looks like this:
spamd -d -c -a
In /etc/procmailrc I have:
:0fw
| /usr/bin/spamc -u spamd
Before adding the -u to spamc, no proce
Is your home directory mounted via NFS?
C
Skip Montanaro wrote:
SM> debug: 31245 Trying to get lock on /home/skip/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist
pass 22
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August
Craig> Ok, so try running
Craig> spamd -c -a -D -L
Craig> from the command line, then see what it says when you pipe
Craig> something through spamc.
A whole series of lines like
debug: 31245 Trying to get lock on /home/skip/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist pass 22
I killed sp
Skip Montanaro wrote:
SM> If I run spamd from a terminal window as root like so:
SM>
SM> spamd -D -L
SM>
SM> I can feed it spam via spamc to my heart's content and it all works as
SM> expected. (In fact, I fed it about 23,000 saved spams earlier. It
SM> identified 19,000 as spam and 4,000 a
>From the messages I've seen recently on this subject, I don't think I'm the
only person who can't get the spamc/spamd combination working. I'm using SA
v2.11 on a Mandrake 8.1 system with perl 5.6.1. (Well, now I'm running
2.20. See below.)
If I run spamd from a terminal window as root like
>The basis of the problems seems to be that sendmail won't send the full email
>across to spamc for whatever reason, at least on some platforms. Seems like it
>would be logical for the whole message to get sent, then to read the whole
Wouldn't it be rather spamass-milter that is not sending the
Thanks Craig,
I'll try the MIMEDefang and see what happens
Jim
--
On 2002.05.15 14:09 Craig R Hughes wrote:
> Though I've never used sendmail/milter myself, from observing the
> comments
> flying back and forth on this list about using spamass-milter I think
> the answer
> is one of a few
Though I've never used sendmail/milter myself, from observing the comments
flying back and forth on this list about using spamass-milter I think the answer
is one of a few things:
1. Use MIMEDefang as a front end for SpamAssassin instead of spamass-milter.
MIMEDefang apparently works, spamass-mil
Speaking of dying.
We have been seeing a problem with spamc/spamd just getting
HUNG on both Solaris-2.8 and Redhat-7.2
I have already applied the patch for spamc hangs due to
large message size (although that's never been what hangs things)
so that's not what's going on here.
In a n
Hi all (sorry, this is kinda long),
Having a weee bit of a problem I hope everyone can help with. New
SpamAssassin installation, the setup is as follows:
RedHat 6.2
Exim 3.36
perl-5.00503-12
SpamAssassin 2.20
Mail-Audit-2.1
MailTools-1.44
Net-DNS-0.12
Time-HiRes-01.20
razor-agents-1.19
Digest-
46 matches
Mail list logo
