Hannu Liljemark wrote:
now, the spamass-milter daemon seems to stop running every few
minutes.
Run this every minute from cron until you find the problem. Nutscrape
has wrapped a couple of these lines.
#!/bin/sh
PATH=/bin:/usr/bin
PID=`ps -ax | grep spamass-milter | grep -v grep | cut -c 1-5 |
t
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Mark Merchant wrote:
> not sure if this is a spamassassin or milter issue, but here goes.
>
> i've been running spammassassin 2.54 & spamass-milter for 6 months or
> so. yesterday i decided to upgrade to 2.6 ( via cpan ).
>
> now, the spamass-milter daemon seems to stop runnin
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 11:27:10AM -0500, Mike Carlson wrote:
> I am getting this in my logs when I send a test message.
>
> Oct 22 11:39:23 hades sendmail[2157]: h9MGZNQk002157: Milter
> (spamassassin): timeout before data read
> Oct 22 11:39:23 hades sendmail[2157]: h9MGZNQk002157: Milter
> (s
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 04:21:10PM -0400, Mark Merchant wrote:
> now, the spamass-milter daemon seems to stop running every few
> minutes.
>
> is spamassassin 2.60 not comapatible with milter anymore?
> did the install whack something unobvious?
Have you tried running the milter with increased l
not sure if this is a spamassassin or milter issue, but here goes.
i've been running spammassassin 2.54 & spamass-milter for 6 months or
so. yesterday i decided to upgrade to 2.6 ( via cpan ).
now, the spamass-milter daemon seems to stop running every few
minutes.
is spamassassin 2.60 not comapati
I am getting this in my logs when I send a test message.
Oct 22 11:39:23 hades sendmail[2157]: h9MGZNQk002157: Milter (spamassassin):
timeout before data read
Oct 22 11:39:23 hades sendmail[2157]: h9MGZNQk002157: Milter (spamassassin):
to error state
Any ideas?
--Mike
Hi,
what's the best way to integrate spamassassin via sendmail's milter
functionality in sendmail: spamass-milter or mimedefang?
What are the basic differences between spamass-milter or mimedefang?
Thanks,
Marcus
--
Marcus Schopen(0>
P.O. Box 10 25 25 //\ Deutsche Zope User Grou
>> OK, thanks but I tried that already. However savannah might be
>> having problems with php since when I try to download via
>> "View Raw Patch" it only wants me to download the file
>> "download.php", and not any patch package... You wouldn't
>> happen to have the files yourself somewhere for me
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 11:38:00AM +0300, wilma wrote:
> > There's a patch for spamass-milter that will do something like
> > that: dump mails tagged as spam to e.g. local spamd user's
> > mailbox.
> >
> > Take a look at patch IDs 415 and 411 at
> > http://savannah.nongnu.org/patch/?group=spamass-
>> I have successfully installed spamass-milter together with SA
>> and sendmail on RH8.
...
>> What I would like to do is to redirect all the spam-tagged mail to
>> either a local user or to /dev/null.
> There's a patch for spamass-milter that will do something like that:
> dump mails tagged as s
> What I would like to do is to redirect all the spam-tagged mail to
> either a local user or to /dev/null.
I'm using the envelope milter (http://www.chaos.org.uk/~richard/sw/) to
redirect tagged messages to an alternate e-mail address on my Lotus Domino
mail server. (Since Domino mail stores a
> I have successfully installed spamass-milter together with SA
> and sendmail on RH8.
...
> What I would like to do is to redirect all the spam-tagged mail to
> either a local user or to /dev/null.
There's a patch for spamass-milter that will do something like that:
dump mails tagged as spam to e
On Wed, 28 May 2003, wilma wrote:
> Hi,
> I have successfully installed spamass-milter together with SA and sendmail on RH8.
> On the mailserver there are no local accounts and all mails are routed to our
> internal mailserver via the /etc/aliases file.
>
> The mails which are going via aliases
Hi,
I have successfully installed spamass-milter together with SA and sendmail on RH8.
On the mailserver there are no local accounts and all mails are routed to our internal
mailserver via the /etc/aliases file.
The mails which are going via aliases are parsed fine and if it´s spam the subject is
I’m trying to figure out a way to delete all messages
that are marked as spam. Preferably, I’d rather send all messages
with a score of 6+ >/dev/null
I’m not even sure if this is possible or not with the
setup that I’m using. I’m using spamass-milter on my
mail gateway. Mail is not
i'm using the spamass milter.
but i'm using it on a step-through (relay-in) sendmail system,
NOT on the system that receives email for local delivery.
is there any way to utilise the spamd methodology when i don't
have procmail involved (at this relay level)?
--
/"\
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 11:15:58PM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 10:03:54PM -0700, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 09:40:17PM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> >
> > > I think I'm also going to add an option to just stall the SMTP
> > > connection and never retur
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 10:03:54PM -0700, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 09:40:17PM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
>
> > I think I'm also going to add an option to just stall the SMTP
> > connection and never return ok (I don't plan to use that feature
> > though)
>
> If once can spe
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 09:40:17PM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> I think I'm also going to add an option to just stall the SMTP
> connection and never return ok (I don't plan to use that feature
> though)
If once can specify the duration of the stall, that'd be quite fun...
Jeremy
--
Jeremy D. Z
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 04:42:28PM +0100, Keith Whyte wrote:
> I thought that the milter was going to actually tell the sendmail and thus
> the sender that the spam was detected and drop the SMTP session, but it
> just accepts it and sends it on.
You can do that with my sa-exim patch for exim:
>Second - does the milter get called for every distinct recipient, or is
>it called once per session, with a callback call per recipient? Reason I
>ask is, this particular server is a relay only, no local delivery. I've
>got a feeling that there is no way I will reasonably be able to have
>per-rec
On Wed, 29 May 2002, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 04:42:28PM +0100, Keith Whyte wrote:
> > There's no functional difference between running milter and
> > running spamc from /etc/procmailrc
>
> There is actually. You process the message once at reception, not
> multiple
I've got SA up and running wonderfully with razor, dcc, and SQL based
per-user config on our qmail server. I have another serer elsewhere that
is running sendmail that I'm planning on testing out SA on. (Separate
organization.)
First question - can someone send me a copy of the generated sendmail
On Wed, 29 May 2002, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 04:42:28PM +0100, Keith Whyte wrote:
> > There's no functional difference between running milter and
> > running spamc from /etc/procmailrc
>
> There is actually. You process the message once at reception, not
> multiple times
Hi Keith,
> I just got spamass milter working with sendmail 8.12, good enough,
> interesting installing latest sendmail and everything, but i have to ask
> myself what's the point?
I also did some tests with Spamassassin-Milter on Sendmail 8.12.3. I usually
run spamd/spamc on SUN/Cobalt RaQs wi
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 04:42:28PM +0100, Keith Whyte wrote:
> There's no functional difference between running milter and
> running spamc from /etc/procmailrc
There is actually. You process the message once at reception, not
multiple times at delivery (imagine a message to a mailing list for 10
You may want look at using SA vi Mimedefang as your milter.
http://www.roaringpenguin.com/mimedefang/
Bounce, drop, discard, notify, quarantine, do what you will based on SA scores ...
Keith Whyte wrote:
>
> I just got spamass milter working with sendmail 8.12, good enough,
> interesting insta
I just got spamass milter working with sendmail 8.12, good enough,
interesting installing latest sendmail and everything, but i have to ask
myself what's the point?
I thought that the milter was going to actually tell the sendmail and thus
the sender that the spam was detected and drop the SMT
28 matches
Mail list logo
