On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 11:15:58PM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote: > On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 10:03:54PM -0700, Jeremy Zawodny wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 09:40:17PM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote: > > > > > I think I'm also going to add an option to just stall the SMTP > > > connection and never return ok (I don't plan to use that feature > > > though) > > > > If once can specify the duration of the stall, that'd be quite fun... > > That's obviously the idea, although I'll probably have a hard time > getting over the RFC violations this introduces...
Yeah, well... > If you do that, you'd better have secondary MXes that do the same > thing than you though.... Actually, I was thinking of trying it on the secondary MXes only. I've seen some spammers like to deliver to secondaries rather than primaries. They are the ones I'd like to screw around with. :-) I suspect that they wouldn't try the primary MX. Jeremy -- Jeremy D. Zawodny | Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://jeremy.zawodny.com/ _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
