Re: [SAtalk] defang_mime is now report_safe but.......

At 01:38 PM 7/18/2003 -0400, Adam Denenberg wrote: Sorry for the repost, but trying to get this all figured out. Now that i know defang_mime has evolved into "report_safe 2", does anybody know how to get the defang capabilities without SA actaully putting a report in the email? You might be able t

[SAtalk] defang_mime is now report_safe but.......

Sorry for the repost, but trying to get this all figured out. Now that i know defang_mime has evolved into "report_safe 2", does anybody know how to get the defang capabilities without SA actaully putting a report in the email? thanks in advance adam -

Re: [SAtalk] defang_mime in 2.55

nging". So is there a way to get the mimedefang feature of report_safe 2 withouth the SA report ? thanks adam - Original Message - From: "Bob Apthorpe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 12:22 PM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] de

Re: [SAtalk] defang_mime in 2.55

Hi, On 16 Jul 2003 11:08:57 -0400 Adam Denenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > is defang_mime still an option in 2.55 ? Can it be placed in sql table > for user prefs? > > I am getting the following error in 2.55 > > : debug: retrieving prefs for [EMAIL PROTECTED] from SQL server > > Jul 16

Re: [SAtalk] defang_mime in 2.55

would i be correct in saying report_safe 2 does what i remember defang_mime to do? (strips out html and converts email to text). I dont want any extra reports added to the email . thanks adam On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 11:59, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 11:08:57AM -0400, Adam

Re: [SAtalk] defang_mime in 2.55

On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 11:08:57AM -0400, Adam Denenberg wrote: > is defang_mime still an option in 2.55 ? Can it be placed in sql table > for user prefs? nope. look at "report_safe". -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "I love drag queens, you can take 'em to dinner and then dancing, and if you g

[SAtalk] defang_mime in 2.55

is defang_mime still an option in 2.55 ? Can it be placed in sql table for user prefs? I am getting the following error in 2.55 : debug: retrieving prefs for [EMAIL PROTECTED] from SQL server Jul 16 10:41:06 somehost spamd[18395]: debug: Failed to parse line in SpamAssassin configuration, ski

Re: [SAtalk] defang_mime

* Ronan Lucio ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > #== > whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] > whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > whitelist_to[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > defang_mime 0 > use_terse_report1 > report_header

[SAtalk] defang_mime

Hello, I create the file /etc/mail/spamassassin/user_prefs with the follow content: #== whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] whitelist_to[EMAIL PROTECTED] defang_mime 0 use_terse_report

RE: [SAtalk] defang_mime doesn't work

-a Linux red3 2.4.18-3 #1 Thu Apr 18 07:37:53 EDT 2002 i686 unknown -Original Message- From: Kevin Gagel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 1:32 PM To: Cindi Ma Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: [SAtalk] defang_mime doesn't work Have you res

Re: [SAtalk] defang_mime doesn't work

Have you restarted spamd? You'll need to, to make the change active. I'm using 2.41 and previously 2.x with this feature, and no problems. > Cindi Ma wrote: > > Hi, all > > Since users like to keep the Embedded HTML in their e-mails, I have been > trying to make defang_mime working. But there i

[SAtalk] defang_mime doesn't work

Title: Message Hi, all   Since users like to keep the Embedded HTML in their e-mails, I have been trying to make defang_mime working. But there is no luck. Need some help here. I have /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf file configured as below:   defang_mime 0 required_hits 7.5 report_header

Re: [SAtalk] defang_mime

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Said Pete O'Hara on Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 02:42:30PM -0400: > I understand what defang_mime is doing at the surface level - - > change the Content-type: header of suspected spam to ``text/plain''. > And I have read rfc1521 which describes the differe

Re: [SAtalk] defang_mime

On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 02:42:30PM -0400, Pete O'Hara wrote: > I understand what defang_mime is doing at the surface level - >- change the Content-type: header of suspected spam to > ``text/plain''. And I have read rfc1521 which describes the different > content types: text, multipart, appli

[SAtalk] defang_mime

Hi, I understand what defang_mime is doing at the surface level - - change the Content-type: header of suspected spam to ``text/plain''. And I have read rfc1521 which describes the different content types: text, multipart, application, ... What I am trying to find out is what are the consequ

[SAtalk] defang_mime 0

I'm currently building a solution to forward the spam to another server for our subscribers to later check if they so wish. So in doing this I set defang_mime 0 so that the email would make it to the spam server still in its original format other than the changed subject and the spam print o