Re: [SAtalk] Re: Spammer's new ideas ...

2002-02-15 Thread Scott Walde
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Daniel Pittman wrote: > >> Actually, this raises an interesting issue with AWLs where it'll have > >> no way of knowing you're you and not someone else with whom you > >> regularly correspond, which is probably bad, because as you point > >> out, the spammer can easily say th

RE: [SAtalk] Re: Spammer's new ideas ...

2002-02-14 Thread Greg Blakely
nce I know nobody in mainland China, I just filtered out the entire .cn TLD. That in itself filtered out a BUNCH of spam. -Original Message- From: Daniel Pittman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 3:30 PM To: Andre Bonhote Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] Re:

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Spammer's new ideas ...

2002-02-14 Thread Craig Hughes
I agree pretty much with Daniel -- doesn't look like something which could be added to SA that would have general applicability. C On Thu, 2002-02-14 at 13:30, Daniel Pittman wrote: > On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Andre Bonhote wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 11:09:00PM -0800, Craig Hughes wrote: > >

[SAtalk] Re: Spammer's new ideas ...

2002-02-14 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Andre Bonhote wrote: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 11:09:00PM -0800, Craig Hughes wrote: [...] >> Actually, this raises an interesting issue with AWLs where it'll have >> no way of knowing you're you and not someone else with whom you >> regularly correspond, which is probably b