I agree pretty much with Daniel -- doesn't look like something which could be added to SA that would have general applicability.
C On Thu, 2002-02-14 at 13:30, Daniel Pittman wrote: > On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Andre Bonhote wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 11:09:00PM -0800, Craig Hughes wrote: > > [...] > > >> Actually, this raises an interesting issue with AWLs where it'll have > >> no way of knowing you're you and not someone else with whom you > >> regularly correspond, which is probably bad, because as you point > >> out, the spammer can easily say the mail is from you. He's much much > >> less likely to guess someone else who happens to be on your list. > > > > Well, maybe SA should check for the mailhost or at least which region > > the mailhost belongs to. I mean, I usually send mails from .ch domains > > in switzerland, but this spam came from elsewhere (.com, as usual). > > Sadly, that's not going to work too well for me; for a period at my last > job I regularly sent and received mail, aside from a .de with Reply-To > account, another .com.de, a .com.au, a .net and a .org account. :) > > It's an AI-complete problem, trying to work out which accounts are and > are not yours. If you /really/ wanted, though, you could write a custom > rule that looked for your accounts and score down something claiming to > be from you without them... > > Daniel > > -- > I never watch television because it's an ugly piece of furniture, gives off a > hideous light, and, besides, I'm against free entertainment. > -- John Waters > > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk > > _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
