On Saturday 30 August 2003 06:05 CET Chris Barnes wrote:
> I've got 2.60 installed from the cvs, but a version prior to rc1. I've
> held off ungrading for now for 2 reasons:
>
> 1) the version I have seems to be working just fine
> 2) the rc versions seem to have some bugs (to be expected - that's
I've got 2.60 installed from the cvs, but a version prior to rc1. I've
held off ungrading for now for 2 reasons:
1) the version I have seems to be working just fine
2) the rc versions seem to have some bugs (to be expected - that's why
they are "rc").
My question is, when the final release comes
On Saturday 30 August 2003 00:16 CET Simon Byrnand wrote:
> > I don't like that behaviour, too, and will see what I can do about it
> > Malte
>
> All I was attempting to do with the \n's was to change the X-Spam-Status
> header to look like 2.55's - where there is a (folded) newline between
> "requ
On Saturday 30 August 2003 01:19 CET Lucas Albers wrote:
> I'm curious to know what sort of performance increase you should see
> because of this.
Using an network protocol (TCP) for communications on one machine generates
quite some overhead. UNIX sockets don't have this overhead and are thus
b
> On Friday 29 August 2003 04:34 CET Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 01:57:27PM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
>> > Fixed now, but the second part of Theo's fix (assuming he did it :)
>> > doesn't seem to be in there - using any \n's to add a newline into a
>> > report header still e
> On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
>
>> to make it work like before (or make a symlink from /usr/local/etc to
>> /etc).
>> See also bug 2374 [1].
>
>> [1]http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2374
>
> Ah. Reading through the suggestions on Bugzilla - having everything in
> /us
> On Friday 29 August 2003 17:02 CET Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
>> Is there a build switch to tell spamc to use a Unix doimain socket (and
>> the socket name) by default ?
>
> Nope.
>
>> Also, for some reason on rc3, perl Makefile.PL built a system that was
>> looking in /usr/local/etc/spamas
On Friday 29 August 2003 23:31 CET Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Malte S. Stretz wrote on Fri, 29 Aug 2003 17:32:52 +0200:
> > > Also, for some reason on rc3, perl Makefile.PL built a system that
> > > was looking in /usr/local/etc/spamassassin for local.cf instead of in
> > > /etc/mail/spamassasin, as pr
On Friday 29 August 2003 21:52 CET Henrik Schmiediche wrote:
>I would like to second the notion that having to specify SYSCONFDIR
> is going to cause sys-admins problems that do not follow this list. I
> have no problem with the idea in principle; I just think it needs to be
> well documented,
"Henrik Schmiediche" writes:
>
> I would like to second the notion that having to specify SYSCONFDIR
>is going to cause sys-admins problems that do not follow this list. I
>have no problem with the idea in principle; I just think it needs to be
>well documented, preferable with a run-time-instal
: Re: [SAtalk] Re: SpamAssassin 2.60 rc3 released
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
> to make it work like before (or make a symlink from /usr/local/etc to
/etc).
> See also bug 2374 [1].
> [1]http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2374
Ah. Reading through the sugge
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
> to make it work like before (or make a symlink from /usr/local/etc to /etc).
> See also bug 2374 [1].
> [1]http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2374
Ah. Reading through the suggestions on Bugzilla - having everything in
/usr/local/etc may
On Friday 29 August 2003 17:43 CET Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
> That means any of my users who put spamc in their .procmailrc file has to
> know 1) to use a socketpath, and 2) what the path is. I'm looking for a
> compile option to Makefile.PL (or ./configure, or whichever) so that
> spamc, wi
On Friday 29 August 2003 17:02 CET Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
> Is there a build switch to tell spamc to use a Unix doimain socket (and
> the socket name) by default ?
Nope.
> Also, for some reason on rc3, perl Makefile.PL built a system that was
> looking in /usr/local/etc/spamassassin for
On Friday 29 August 2003 04:34 CET Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 01:57:27PM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> > Fixed now, but the second part of Theo's fix (assuming he did it :)
> > doesn't seem to be in there - using any \n's to add a newline into a
> > report header still effecti
15 matches
Mail list logo
