> There are a number of providers that are utterly unresponsive until
> someone (metaphorically) smacks them upside the head with a paving brick.
That works for me.
Where do we sign up?
-JR
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutor
Hi,
> While gargling concrete, "Dan Jacobson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed:
>
> > However, anything in language [X] is always spam, so let me ban [X]
> > without having to unban every other possible language.
>
> Pretty Draconian. Must be nice to be able to do that.
Not 'nice' but 'convenient'; I d
While gargling concrete, "Dan Jacobson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed:
> However, anything in language [X] is always spam, so let me ban [X]
> without having to unban every other possible language.
>
>
Pretty Draconian. Must be nice to be able to do that.
My clients/customers tend to whine a little
>> And what if it doesn't match any of our ok_languages? then it will
>> fail, against our wishes. Can you guarantee that you know all the
>> possibilities?
D> I still don't understand. You don't speak 1000 languages. Most speak 3
D> or 4 at most They can add these to ok_languanges.
OK, you
D> I'm confused. There is no need for not_ok_languages, as you can simply
D> list all languages but the one you want in ok_languages. Furthermore,
D> few people wish to receive mail in every language.
Just like white list / black list, you have both because it would be a
pain to try to keep track
