fre, 2003-02-14 kl. 16:26 skrev Dallas Engelken:
> a mystery is only something you are not willing to figure out ®
> :)
Basically, it does *not* work when I do as you advise. However, I'm used
to that sort of thing. It began with my mother, when I was still a
suckling.
Thanks anyway, Dallas. I a
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Earnshaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 9:02 AM
> To: Dallas Engelken
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] RE: Outlook FN --> sa-learn-spam
>
>
> fre, 2003-02-14 kl. 15:14 skrev Dal
fre, 2003-02-14 kl. 15:14 skrev Dallas Engelken:
> > Testing it with spamassassin -t < porn.txt now scores 12.9,
> > fine by me.
> > Testing it with 'cat porn.text | spamc' still gives 3.5. Even running
> > spamc as the spamd user.
> > Why would this be?
> did you restart the spamd daemon to re
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Earnshaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 3:34 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] RE: Outlook FN --> sa-learn-spam
>
>
> tor, 2003-02-13 kl. 23:36 skrev Dallas Engelken
tor, 2003-02-13 kl. 23:36 skrev Dallas Engelken:
> Check this example...
>
> Take an email... cat it through spamc to see what bayes scores it. Send it into
>your learning system as spam. cat it through spamc again to see what bayes thinks
>now...
SA>2.50-CVS from mid January last.
I ha
