tor, 2003-02-13 kl. 23:36 skrev Dallas Engelken: > Check this example... > > Take an email... cat it through spamc to see what bayes scores it. Send it into >your learning system as spam. cat it through spamc again to see what bayes thinks >now.......
SA>2.50-CVS from mid January last. I have an example porn mail, which spamd/spamc didn't originally recognize as porn, scored 3.5. I had a couple from the same site, found I didn't want it in future, and added the necessary rules to /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf. I test it for a uri component and for word content - two separate rules.. Testing it with spamassassin -t < porn.txt now scores 12.9, fine by me. Testing it with 'cat porn.text | spamc' still gives 3.5. Even running spamc as the spamd user. Why would this be? Best, Tony -- Tony Earnshaw When you rob a person of his illusions, you are robbing him of his happiness e-post: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.billy.demon.nl ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
