Hello Fred,
Thursday, December 4, 2003, 1:10:56 PM, you wrote:
FIIC> I thought up an idea for this, insted of trying to detect the white
FIIC> text in general, why not try to detect the patterns the spammers
FIIC> are using with them.. Take the following rules as an example:
Run against my corp
I thought up an idea for this, insted of trying to detect the white text in
general, why not try to detect the patterns the spammers are using with
them.. Take the following rules as an example:
rawbody FVGT_rb_WHITE_6_WHITE /f[f0-9].{6}http://www.i-is.com/
--
---Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rubin
> Bennett
> Sent: 04 December 2003 16:56
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Messages full of white text
>
>
> I should probably know this, but how can I tweak the
ing bumping it up.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rubin Bennett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 10:40 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Messages full of white text
>
> Second, it's FULL of whited out html text on a
bject: [SAtalk] Messages full of white text
Second, it's FULL of whited out html text on a default (usually white)
background, which completely baffled my Bayes test. Is there a rule out
there that will catch a message like this and tag it? Like test for
#ff fonts without a different color back
Hello all (again)-
I got this one a little while ago (some headers stripped cause I'm
paranoid...):
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.SchoenfeldIns.com
(ip67-92-30-74.z30-92-67.customer.algx.net [67.92.30.7
