duh.. that was posted earlier this week and it apparently got core dumped. Thanks!
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 12:03, Alan Munday wrote: > Rubin > > Add an entry in your local.cf > > score <test_name> <your_score_value> > > E.g. > > score MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE 4.5 > > Alan > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rubin > Bennett > Sent: 04 December 2003 16:56 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Messages full of white text > > > I should probably know this, but how can I tweak the score upwards a > biton this rule? > > Thanks, > > Rubin > > On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 11:47, Mark Muller wrote: > > There certainly is a rule, and it caught this mail: HTML_FONT_INVISIBLE > > > > The score on it is just really low. I've been pondering bumping it up. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Rubin Bennett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 10:40 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [SAtalk] Messages full of white text > > > > Second, it's FULL of whited out html text on a default (usually white) > > background, which completely baffled my Bayes test. Is there a rule out > > there that will catch a message like this and tag it? Like test for > > #ffffff fonts without a different color background, or the like? > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. > > Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's > > Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. > > Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click > > _______________________________________________ > > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk -- Rubin Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> RB Technologies
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
