I should probably know this, but how can I tweak the score upwards a biton this rule?
Thanks, Rubin On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 11:47, Mark Muller wrote: > There certainly is a rule, and it caught this mail: HTML_FONT_INVISIBLE > > The score on it is just really low. I've been pondering bumping it up. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rubin Bennett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 10:40 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] Messages full of white text > > Second, it's FULL of whited out html text on a default (usually white) > background, which completely baffled my Bayes test. Is there a rule out > there that will catch a message like this and tag it? Like test for > #ffffff fonts without a different color background, or the like? > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. > Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's > Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. > Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk -- Rubin Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> RB Technologies
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
