> "TLS" == Tony L Svanstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
VK> Never underestimate the need for confirmation records...
TLS> Never understimate the stupidity of some people...
TLS> Never underestimate the usefulness of adding a "this was sent to
TLS> [EMAIL PROTECTED]" at the top of mailings;
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003 the voices made Vivek Khera write:
VK> > "JM" == Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
VK>
VK> >> Well written, good content, and industry specific. Also simply having a real
VK> >> email address to reply back is good.
VK>
VK> JM> Actually -- that's a very good point -- r
> "JM" == Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Well written, good content, and industry specific. Also simply having a real
>> email address to reply back is good.
JM> Actually -- that's a very good point -- read the replies, and (important)
JM> honour the bounce messages. If an addr
Chris Santerre said:
> I'm fighting the same problem here. I've passed thru our weekly newsletter
> thru SA and it scores low. We only send to current customers and people in
> the industry. SO I'm not trying to sell an Eskimo Nigerian weight loss sex
> enhancers. :)
>
> Well written, good conte
specific. Also simply having a real
email address to reply back is good.
So far no complaints.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Quinlan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 7:02 AM
To: Matthew Davis
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Guidelines for Mass Mai
Matthew Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On the unsubscribe subject, IMO, having the
> List-(Un)Subscribe/Help/Id: headers will make it look less like spam.
Only if it's not spam to begin with -- specifically a double opt-in one
so the user knows he subscribed. Spammers use those headers ofte
On the unsubscribe subject, IMO, having the List-(Un)Subscribe/Help/Id: headers will
make it look less like spam.
Speaking of which, is this a spam check?
* Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 19:15, Steve Evans wrote:
> > I have a few users wh
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 19:15, Steve Evans wrote:
> I have a few users who want to know how to send mass mailings and not
> get in trouble for sending spam.
Simple:
- don't do opt-out. Never.
- Make sure the people receiving the mails really want this.
- *confirm* all e-mail addresses
- unsubscr
> "SE" == Steve Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SE> I have a few users who want to know how to send mass mailings and not
SE> get in trouble for sending spam. Does anyone know of a website with
You can't. Period. You will *always* get complaints about your mail
no matter what you do. No
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 10:15:18AM -0800, Steve Evans wrote:
> I have a few users who want to know how to send mass mailings and not
> get in trouble for sending spam. Does anyone know of a website with
> guidelines that talk about opt-in/opt-out, how to know who you can send
> mass mailings to, w
I have a few users who want to know how to send mass mailings and not
get in trouble for sending spam. Does anyone know of a website with
guidelines that talk about opt-in/opt-out, how to know who you can send
mass mailings to, what kind of wording to use for the opt-out, etc.
Steve Evans
SDSU Fo
11 matches
Mail list logo
