On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Rich Puhek wrote:
>
>
> Malte S. Stretz wrote:
> > On Tuesday 11 February 2003 18:51 CET Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
> >
> >>[...]
> >> When a domain is involved in spamming it's added to a list, and whenever
> >>a local user is trying to access that website he gets a "hardcoded
I am not a TMDA user or developer, but it does allow for acking of mail
that won't pass the challenge/responce (mailling lists, automated e-mails
from amazon.com and such).
It keeps a queue of stuff that it didn't let through for a configurable
time (24hr default). You have to manually add maillin
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, John Rudd wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, Oct 23, 2002, at 14:22 US/Pacific,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > mailscanner started to choke whenever loads of e-mail came in.
>
> Sounds like my servers. Any time we get a big chunk of messages come
> in, I have to worry about whether o
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002, Kim Leandersson wrote:
> Hello!
>
> We've used spamd/spamc for a while for a limited number of users as
> evaluation. It has worked great! Now we have put together a machine that
> we wish to use as smtp gateway. We installed Mimedefang and want it to
> use spamassassin to sca
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Scott Lambert wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 03:01:52PM -0500, Paul Oster wrote:
> > I'm building a SA box for a smallish ISP (2500 mailboxes) what kind of
> > machine should I be looking at?
>
> Impossible to say. How much mail do your users receive?
If you're running s
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Kevin J. Steil wrote:
> Also, which will perform better...using mailscanner or a milter in
> sendmail??
>
> This is an enterprise SMTP Gateway...going to be passing about 10K to
> 20k message per day.
>
I've used both mailscanner and mimedefang, and mimedefang (a milter) is
D
Hello,
I'm trying to determine how many spamassassin hits are appropriate for
tagging messages at different levels of it possibly being spam.
I have spamassassin 2.31 running on a production machine, and figured out
some good numbers for that situation. I installed 2.43 on a different
machine, an
