Was testing out our recent install of Squirrelmail (web based IMAP MUA)
and noticed the SA results:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=6.0
tests=MSG_ID_ADDED_BY_MTA_3,NO_REAL_NAME,USER_AGENT
version=2.50
Squirrelmail generates its own Message-ID - I didn't look in the source
to
Steve Halligan wrote:
> People, please configure your virus scanners not to reply to the sender.
> Most viri these days are spoofing the sender anyway.
And most viruses too.
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites incl
Ralf Guenthner wrote:
> Guys, it's not quite as stated before here. The headers of that particular
> e-mail clearly show that the virus was posted to this mailinglist, it was
> not merely a forged from: address. My qmail-scanner quarantined it and is
> intelligent enough to recognize the sender is
Paul-Henri Lampe wrote:
> That's why my question might be an easy one: I would like
> spamassassin to ignore mail that was already checked (based on the
> X-Spam header for example). I went through the different cf files
> without finding anything.
>
> Is there a configuration option that coul
Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Will Yardley wrote:
> > If I do: |sa-learn --spam
> > from within mutt or Pine, it seems to just sit there.
>
> It needs --single as well.
>
> In pine what you want to do is
>
> |
Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Will Yardley wrote:
> > If I do: |sa-learn --spam
> > from within mutt or Pine, it seems to just sit there.
>
> It needs --single as well.
>
> In pine what you want to do is
>
> |
Colin Bell wrote:
> My main machine is at home, but I also read e-mail through a webmail
> client at work. I would like to filter out the 'likely spam'
> automatically to avoid clogging the webmail client. At present I end
> up deleting all the spam that arrives in work hours by hand...
> I t
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 01:20:25PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> > than it is to export the message to a file, open a subshell, and then do:
> >
> > sa-learn --spam --single < spamfile
> >
> > Perhaps sa-learn could accept messa
When I build SA in a user's home directory, stuff seems to go in
~/sauser/local/bin instead of just ~/sauser/bin. Is this the intended
behavior? My recollection in the past was that it put stuff in ~/sauser/bin.
If it matters, I'm using Debian 3.0 on x86 hardware with Perl 5.6.1.
Is there an easy way to pipe a message to sa-learn as you can with
bogofilter?
For instance, when using a console based mailer like mutt or Pine, it's a lot
easier to do:
|spamassassin -d | bogofilter -S
(to remove SA markup and mark a message as spam within bogofilter)
than it is to export the m
o send their spam in the first place).
--
Will Yardley
input: william < @ hq . newdream . net . >
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
r your moderated lists *first* and then pipe
it through spamassassin.
of course this involves learning procmail or maildrop if you don't
already know them
--
Will Yardley
input: william < @ hq . newdream . net . >
___
Spamassassin-t
han that, perhaps you could add a whitelist entry for headers
found in each list, but that's kind of a pain.
--
Will Yardley
input: william < @ hq . newdream . net . >
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
receive messages from customers, spam reports, and
other things that are likely to trigger a spam filter don't necessarily
have the luxury of simply rejecting everything.
--
Will Yardley
input: william < @ hq . newdream . net . >
__
CPT TO" but still bounce
the message...
--
Will Yardley
william @ newdream . net
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
spamassassin - i've gotten a lot fewer false matches, while still
catching most spam - and without having to whitelist half the people i
know.
--
Will Yardley
william @ newdream . net
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
r a particular user, or if i
want the same installation to be common over several different machines
with their home directories mounted via NFS.
in any event, any comments on how to do this, or reasons why it's not
possible to make it simpler would be gre
17 matches
Mail list logo
