[sorry - don't have the original message anymore, so responding to this one]
> I don't see much point in tagging spam and then delivering it anyway. > The spammers still got their message through. So what if it's in a > special little folder all its own? well personally, that "special little folder" helps keep my life a little more sane. i don't mind spam half as much as long as it stays out of my inbox. admittedly this does little to solve the root of the problem, but it at least allows me to concentrate on things other than the fact that my inbox has 15 spam messages in it :> i still can send a LART if i feel like it (or just delete the message if i don't have the energy). i'd love to reject spam outright, but i have yet to see a system that doesn't have at least some amount of false positives. also, those of us who receive messages from customers, spam reports, and other things that are likely to trigger a spam filter don't necessarily have the luxury of simply rejecting everything. -- Will Yardley input: william < @ hq . newdream . net . > _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
