DCC should help in this case, right? Its model is to calculate a fuzzy
checksum.
I suppose when the next version of SA which works with DCC is out, you can
expect to see a better result.
Weidong
- Original Message -
From: "Fred Inklaar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "SpamAssassin" <[EMAIL PROT
With "-L" option, SA runs much faster.
But I do want to do certain network related testing, like razor (I can tell
it comes back quickly), but not some others, like DNS lookup (when doing it
with a domain name that is not valid, or its master named has been down for
certain time, you will hit DNS
> > 1. is 1 min normal? Of all the tests, is there a subset that takes most
of
> > the time?
>
> It depends ... Can you define "low end server"? What CPU, how much RAM,
> what's the normal load on the box ...? On my P200, RH 7.2, 256MB RAM,
> low load, messages typically take 2-5 seconds.
>
I w
Hi, I just installed spamassassin, as it looks very promising.
One thing I noticed is that checking a mail (the sample-spam.txt one, 4K)
one takes over 1 minute. At first I thought it is razor, as I noticed during
"make test" that razor test took a long time. But after disabling razor
(setting RA
