DCC should help in this case, right? Its model is to calculate a fuzzy checksum. I suppose when the next version of SA which works with DCC is out, you can expect to see a better result.
Weidong ----- Original Message ----- From: "Fred Inklaar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "SpamAssassin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 10:54 AM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Trick to bypass Razor > op 13-06-2002 16:42 schreef Bart Schaefer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Fred Inklaar wrote: > > > >> In this case however, a single line of garbage is added to to the message, > >> making Razor generating a different CRC for each one, in effect escaping > >> Razor. And there's not SA rule yet to catch this unique id in the > >> messagebody. > > > > You'll excuse me for saying so, but ... so what? The messages got a score > > of 5.9 and so were properly tagged as spam by SA, so it obviously needed > > neither Razor nor a rule for that unique ID to work properly. > > Indeed, this message does, but it wouldn't surprise me at all to see this > technique applied more widely. And then we will see spam that does manage to > stay under the 5.0 treshold. > > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference > August 25-28 in Las Vegas - http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink > > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas - http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
