Re: [SAtalk] Recieved From database

gain, Robert, for all your help. I'll be sure to post any additional rules I come up with that have some chance of being effective ... -- ---------- Sylvain Robitaille [EMAIL PROTECTED] Systems analy

Re: [SAtalk] Recieved From database

ork for the software to check against (though I have no benchmarking tests to support that hypothesis). The readability is rather important to me, in cases where others will need to understand what I've written. -- ---------- Sylv

Re[3]: [SAtalk] Recieved From database

d sending in an Apache Contributor License Agreement so the SA > developers can use this rule? I'll be glad to, as soon as I can figure out where to get what I need, and what needs to be submitted how, etc. If I need to provide test results, may I quote yours? -- -------

Re: [SAtalk] Recieved From database

Assassin? Can I not just email my contribution somewhere? -- ---------- Sylvain Robitaille [EMAIL PROTECTED] Systems analyst / Postmaster Concordia University Instructional & Informat

Re[2]: [SAtalk] Recieved From database

kly, this alone should be grounds # for rejection ... > That's almost 15k ham matched, out of 17.6k ham in my corpus. I don't suppose I could lean on you to try the above? Thanks for the followup, I really appreciate it ... -- -------

Re: [SAtalk] Recieved From database

# for rejection ... NOTE: I've not yet tested this rule, but so far in the mail I have, it would match only on spam ... -- ---------- Sylvain Robitaille [EMAIL PROTECTED] Systems analys

Re: [SAtalk] SA Rule idea: whois

(followup to my own message ...) On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Sylvain Robitaille wrote: > http://alcor.concordia.ca/~syl/packages/spambounce.pl Sorry! I'd forgotten about the redirection from there to my home web server. I've now made sure the script is available via the above URL ..

Re: [SAtalk] SA Rule idea: whois

e "-wT" options. Comments, criticisms, and corrections are of course welcome ... -- ---------- Sylvain Robitaille [EMAIL PROTECTED] Systems analyst Concordia Un

Re: [SAtalk] SA Rule idea: whois

ith the expectation that the subset in question would grow to become a majority), but at the moment I prefer not to "privilege" those users more than others. -- ---------- Sylvain Robita

Re: [SAtalk] New Ruleset: EvilNumbers

Anybody see anything wrong with that idea? -- ------ Sylvain Robitaille [EMAIL PROTECTED] Systems analyst / Postmaster Concordia University Instructional & Informa