Carl Chipman wrote:
For the new people on the list, I was wondering what the following acronyms
mean:
LART
UBE/UCE
Are the acronoyms in the FAQ?
Carl,
Luser Attitude Readjustment Tool
Unsolicited Bulk/Commercial Email
Google is your friend,
HAND,
Scott
--
Scott V. Blomquist,A-SA-CN-NRKTINL
Jennifer Wheeler wrote:
Snipped
btw 42??? what did you mean by that. that was very creepy to see,
because i've tried to convince my brother from an early age, that the
number 42 *haunts* me and turns up *everywhere*! that'll either be a
very good year for me, or that's the year i'll buy t
Have you checked your spamtrap folder? Here is the score I got on your
message:
Paulo Lenz wrote:
This mail is probably spam. The original message has been attached
along with this report, so you can recognize or block similar unwanted
mail in future. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more
Jeff Lasman wrote:
I've recently seen a bit of spam (not caught by SA as I run it) with the
following as the contents of the plain text portion of the email:
This message contains an HTML formatted message but your email client
does not support the display of HTML. Please view this message in
Ian,
Who are you going to bounce it to? 99.9% of all the crud that falls
into my server has forged FROM: and Rely-to: addresses. Just let your
old friend Dave Null read it and forget about it.
my $0.02
Scott
ian douglas wrote:
Right now I have MailScanner configured to delete high scoring s
VonEssen, John wrote:
If you go this route then, maybe it might be easier to just aggressively
post invalid email addresses all over the internet. By invalid, I mean a
mx record exists, but the address will result in a 550. As a result the
harvesting of addresses will become a dirtier process, yie
Frrom somewhere in another dimension Leon Oosterwijk wrote:
All,
I would like some feedback from you all on the following idea. What if
spamassassin followed unsubscribe links for all emails that came through
it's filter for emails that are obviously spam. This way people would
automatically g
Simon Byrnand wrote:
We run around 50%. And that's by count. With the MS worms flying in we
have noticably more spam by volume than real mail.
Our current stats are 57% Spam, 43% ham. And thats not counting viruses,
which get blocked before spamassassin even runs.
Kinda makes you wonder where
Jeff Lasman wrote:
>
> I'm still not sure if I should run through "ham" as well as "spam" or
> not. Is there a specific answer for this?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Jeff
Hi Jeff,
Bayes won't kick in until it has >200 ham/spam in the database.
You should sa-learn --ham against as wide a range of your normal
O-Zone wrote:
Hi all,
here's the header of an e-mail of spam passing througth spamassassin. It seems
do not work. Why ?
Date-warning: Date header was inserted by smtp.telnor.net
From: Technical Services <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Newest Network Patch
To: MS Corporation User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jack Gostl wrote:
Out of curiosity, what is the highest scoring anyone has seen SA give a
message? I had one come through at 37.54 the other day.
In my current batch of "caught" spam I have some in the high 50s, but I
think I once saw a 70+.
-Mike Carlson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.uselesstho
Nigel Wilkinson wrote:
Hi folks
the spammassassin FAQ suggests creating public folders on an imap server
for moving missed spam and false spam into so that the bayesian stuff
can learn. Could someone point me to some documentation or give me a
pointer on how to create these please.
Cheers
Nigel
jpf wrote:
Is there someway that I can edit the subject line to get the SA score in
there? I am using SA 2.55 and procmail.
TIA
jpf
Here is the top two lines from my local.cf file. Works great
rewrite_subject 1
subject_tag [SA Says: _HITS_]
It gives the following results:
[SA Says: 63.3
Hi folks,
I just received the attached maessage, it tripped SA at 5.6 but the only
thing that got hit was the BL rules. How did this get such a low score?
curious,
Scott
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.6 required=5.0
tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_NJABL
I have SA running for my company of 56 fulltime users and about 20
part-timers. Linux/sendmail/procmail It took about an hour to install
and configure. I was paranoid at first and only ran it on my account and
my catch-all box for testing, I did that for 2 days to be sure of the
program. I the
15 matches
Mail list logo
