Jeff Lasman wrote:
> > I'm still not sure if I should run through "ham" as well as "spam" or > not. Is there a specific answer for this? > > Thanks. > > Jeff
Hi Jeff,
Bayes won't kick in until it has >200 ham/spam in the database.
You should sa-learn --ham against as wide a range of your normal messages as possible so Bayes will have a good set of normal tokens for ham. You don't have to train in equal amounts my database is about 70/30 spam/ham and I'm running 99% with 0 false positives in the last month.
hth,
Scott
--
Scott V. Blomquist,A-SA-CN-NRK TINLC(tm) #2598
ITI/Bear&Co Rochester, VT
802-767-3174(v) 802-767-3726(f)
"Any technology sufficiently advanced is indistinguishable from Magic."
A. C. Clarke------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
