Re: [SAtalk] Spamwriter

2004-01-14 Thread Satya
t high speed mentality) You have got to be kidding. Or trolling. I don't proliferate viruses. I don't even run Outlook. I don't spam. Having a broadband connection doesn't automatically make me a criminal. Sheesh. Stupid people everywhere. -- Satya. http://www.thesatya.com/>

RE: [SAtalk] Spamwriter

2004-01-14 Thread Satya
ULs (D=dynamic/dialup). ObSpamassassin: Using a DUL as a SA datapoint with a low absolute score is alright. 550-ing based on DULness is worse than 550-ing on ccTLDs. -- Satya. http://www.thesatya.com/> Moo! --- This SF.net email is sponsored by:

Re: [SAtalk] False positive

2003-12-11 Thread Satya
ing because the email comes from .ru or East Asia or is in the wrong langauge. I guess I'll just start blocking all email from Earthlink (I don't know anyone there), Sprint (same), AOL, .uk, .eu, .za, .au, (Read 'scoring' instead of 'blocking', if you prefer.) --

Re: [SAtalk] Re: More .procmailrc

2003-12-05 Thread Satya
*) > Spamfolder Oddly enough, :0: * ^X-Spam-Level: \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\* spam works for me. -- Satya. http://www.thesatya.com/> It's worse than that, it's Physics, Jim! --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Be

Re: [SAtalk] BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS!!!!

2003-12-05 Thread Satya
hould be listed if it actually is a spam source, but not wholesale dynamic blocks!) >It's tough, but your decision is simple: Zero False Positives means that >these sites can't be listed. I agree. -- Satya. http://www.thesatya.com/> Here be dragons.

RE: [SAtalk] BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS!!!!

2003-12-03 Thread Satya
On Dec 3, 2003 at 12:43, Jennifer Wheeler wrote: >You should grab multiedit. Rockage. You can do your edits with little >macros. Perl! sed! Makefiles! -- Satya. http://www.thesatya.com/> The lab called: your brain is ready --- Th

Re: [SAtalk] How to config Spam Assassin to reject spam > x.xx

2003-12-01 Thread Satya
spam with a score of greater than say 15. Procmail recipe: :0: * ^X-Spam-Level: \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\* mail/spam mail/spam is a folder, I don't /dev/null spam. As many stars as you want, 15 in your case. >My guess looking at the docs is that SA only tags mail and cant send it >/d

Re: [SAtalk] An Open Letter to the SA-talk forum

2003-11-26 Thread Satya
tools aimed at end-users. Unfortunately, I haven't read the original article (I was hanging out on /. yesterday and picked up some bad habits). I have just skimmed the article. -- Satya. http://www.thesatya.com/> Hi! I'm a tagline virus! Steal me & join in the fun! --

RE: [SAtalk] An Open Letter to the SA-talk forum

2003-11-25 Thread Satya
not* as easy to install as a shrink-wrapped GUI-based >Windoze program. Whereas some of those shrink-wrapped GUI-based programs won't even install, and if installed won't work, on non-Windows platforms. Sometimes not even on different versions of Windows. -- Satya. http://www.thes

Re: [SAtalk] A black listing question

2003-11-11 Thread Satya
c IPs, spam-friendly ISPs (that includes all ISPs, by some of the more liberal definition of 'spam-friendly'), and also the range 0.0.0.0/0. I'm just sore from gettin caught by rDNS and dynamic IP rules. -- Satya. http://www.thesatya.com/> The option to override self-des

Re: [SAtalk] RE: [RD] spam sentences

2003-11-06 Thread Satya
ne of) India's largest ISPs. It'd be like blocking AOL. >I did not contact the ISP. They are likely spammer friendly. More like apathetic. Let me forward this to a few people and see if we can get the spam to stop. Don't bother emailing the domain contacts, they'll probably

Re: [SAtalk] [RD] evil rules holdup. Stupid grep! (fwd)

2003-11-03 Thread Satya
-- Satya. http://www.thesatya.com/> "shutdown -halt now" - The final word in network security tools. -- Forwarded message -- Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 18:02:53 -0500 (EST) From: Satya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Spamassassin-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subjec

RE: [SAtalk] [OT] What is next step?

2003-10-25 Thread Satya
ial" customers to their relay servers and that the >header From match the MAIL FROM envelope. What if we asked legislation to See above. Anyone who asks me to get a business-class connection is invited to send donations to pay my bills. :-) -- Satya. http://www.thesatya.com/

Re: [SAtalk] bayes learning "To" and "Received" headers?

2003-10-18 Thread Satya
ody-based Bayesian a little bit more than just body-based. Beyond a certain point, it's difficult to fake received headers. -- Satya. http://www.thesatya.com/> One man's "magic" is another man's engineering. "S

RE: [SAtalk] dynablock confusion...

2003-10-01 Thread Satya
o through without getting fuxored. Damn spammers. -- Satya. http://www.thesatya.com/> Never park your hard disk in a tow-away zone. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to

Re: [SAtalk] 'Opt'

2003-10-01 Thread Satya
think there's a way to submit bug reports. Should be on the spamassassin website. -- Satya. http://satyap.csoft.net/> Due to a general lack of interest, Monday is cancelled. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek W

Re: [SAtalk] Does the * in the X-Spam-Level header upset procmail

2003-09-30 Thread Satya
On Oct 1, 2003 at 00:03, Nigel Wilkinson wrote: >I want to filter useing the number of asterixes in the X-Spam-Level >header but I think this is a wildcard in procmail. Does anyone know >if this will upset procmail. Yes. Use something like: :0: * ^X-Spam-Status: \*\*\*\*\* /dev/null

Re: [SAtalk] Alt spam scanning products

2003-09-24 Thread Satya
tware... I would, but their website is knee-deep in corpspeak and fancy web pages, and I don't see a real feature list, examples, or anything like that. Admittedly, I only looked for about a minute or so. Looks like you have to pay for it and it might be binary-only. -- Satya. http:

Re: [SAtalk] SA and tagging/removing

2003-09-17 Thread Satya
e every MTA is necessary to configure other way :( Not using SA, my unsubscribing from this list, and all of us stop using computers at all would also make life easier. Whatever happened to doing the Right Thing? -- Satya. http://satya.virtualave.net/> We are sorry, but the number you have dial

Re: [SAtalk] SA and tagging/removing

2003-09-17 Thread Satya
et the mail delivery agent handle the final delivery. -- Satya. http://satya.virtualave.net/> The option to override self-destruct has expir&*%#NO CARRIER --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heav

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie rule submission for SILDENAFIL_GIF

2003-09-14 Thread Satya
On Sep 14, 2003 at 16:59, Bruce, Rob wrote: >I noticed a while ago a focused website dedicated to rule trading, but >now I can't find it. Do you guys know what I'm talking about? http://www.exit0.us/ ? -- Satya. http://satya.virtualave.net/> All wiyht. Rho sritche

RE: [SAtalk] Scanning for an attachment file name

2003-08-21 Thread Satya
On Aug 20, 2003 at 10:05, Matthew Thomas wrote: >/pic.gif/i does not match "pic.gif" Sure it does. It also matches stuff like pic-gif, piclgif, etc. >Try /pic\.gif/i That's probably what the original poster wanted anyway :-) -- Satya. http://satya.virtualave.net/> He

Re:[OT] [SAtalk] Moved into the ex-ip of a spammer

2003-08-15 Thread Satya
On Aug 15, 2003 at 21:18, Rick Macdougall wrote: >Actually changing ISP's is a lot easier than getting a new citizenship >in a new country. While I would never use SPEWS to block email, I am Assuming I have a choice of ISPs in my area, and assuming you'll pay the setup cost.

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie

2003-08-10 Thread Satya
I had zero trouble with spamassassin on debian. http://www.redhat.com/ for Redhat http://www.debian.org/ for Debian They're both Linux "distributions". -- Satya. http://satya.virtualave.net/> Luxuriantly hand-crafted from only the finest ASCII. --

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie trying to set SA up with postfix

2003-08-01 Thread Satya
haps >some one with GAIM and patience to walk me through set up of the two. What's your OS? On Debian, all I had to do was apt-get insall spamassassin, edit my procmailrc to use SA, and add rules to appropriately file messages based on headers after filtering through SA. -- Satya. http:

Re: [SAtalk] some messages not filtering

2003-07-29 Thread Satya
On Jul 29, 2003 at 11:04, spam wrote: >Hello. We're running SA version 2.43 on a Free BSD box (OSX). Everything >seems to work good except that some obvious SPAM is not being filtered. Upgrade to the latest version of SA (2.55). -- Satya. http://satya.virtualave.net/> "

Re: [SAtalk] (OT) DSL/DIALUP manual BL Catch 22

2003-07-15 Thread Satya
there. If someone violates a rule, for example not putting "ADV:" in the subject, and cannot be traced easily (how do you present Received headers and suchlike as evidence in court?), how do you prosecute? -- Satya. http://satya.virtualave.n

Re: [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names

2003-06-30 Thread Satya
example offensive. The previous two sentences are supposed to be humor. If you the reader still find them offensive, I find *you* offensive, and this time I'm not joking. PS: I'm talking to you the reader, and not Tony Earnshaw. Unless you are Tony Earnshaw.) -- Satya. http://satya.virtu

Re: [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names

2003-06-27 Thread Satya
n who just saw the >word 'penis" in an email") with too much time on their hands. They are a >small but vocal minority :) Good, then they can be vocal and complain about spam itself, instead of anti-spam measures. -- Satya. http://satya.virtualave.net/> A year s