24 10:34:22 spam spamd[10079]: identified spam (15.8/5.0) for root:99 in 28
seconds, 25666 bytes.
Sep 24 10:34:33 spam spamd[10087]: identified spam (13.8/5.0) for root:99 in 27
seconds, 4652 bytes.
Kevin Gagel wrote:
>
> Sorry everyone I missed the original...
> >From this messag
Have you restarted spamd?
You'll need to, to make the change active.
I'm using 2.41 and previously 2.x with this feature, and no problems.
> Cindi Ma wrote:
>
> Hi, all
>
> Since users like to keep the Embedded HTML in their e-mails, I have been
> trying to make defang_mime working. But there i
Sorry everyone I missed the original...
>From this message I see that processing should be around 10 seconds or less on a
average email if you are using Razor with SA. I am using razor and my average
seems to be around 20 - 30 seconds for each message. So I would like to know if
there is something
Regarding the report that SA inserts into the email message. If copy that
format into the local.cf file, will my local.cf report replace the default one?
--
Kevin W. Gagel
Network Administrator
College of New Caledonia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(250)562-2131 loc
Amis-v or there is another prefs file that SA is using. I had a heck of a time
figuring out where to find my site wide file because of my configuration.
If your using spamd and you want your users to have some control using
user_prefs then check their ~/spamassassin file.
If your using spamd and
I'm thinking of following this advise too. Is there a good reason that I should
not upgrad to the 2.40 at this time?
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Razor-users] can't find Razor/Client.pm
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 18:16:02 -0400
From: "Tabor J. Wells" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Scott
Based on the following header info, is my rule built correctly?
Received: from (127.0.0.1) by MAIL3041.flowgo.com (PowerMTA(TM) v1.5); Mon, 22
Jul 2002 17:19:56 -0700
(envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
I want to make a rule that will tag it bassed on the flowgo.com in the recieved
lin
Clearly, since I just setup this machine and have never emailed out or used this
email... they have just scanned my network for smtp servers... I was a bit
surprised.
I've only had this machine up and running for about 48 hours.
Original Message
Subject: FlowGo.com Customer Su
No need to recompile...
I believe if you use 10_misc.cf as a template of what to do you can create/use
the local.cf file for what you want to accomplish.
Christopher Crowley wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> This is an old thread. But my question is relevant to it.
Well then that answers that!
Since I just installed Razor 2 I don't have to worry about it until SA is
updated. Then when I upgrade SA it will automatically kick in. Right!
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 01:25:22PM -0700, Kevin Gagel wrote:
> > I've in
I've installed and configured SpamAssassin and have it running smoothly now. I
just downloaded and installed Vipul's Razor. The test indicates it is working
correctly too. I'm not sure on how to configure SA to use VR though? Is it
Automatic or do I need to set something in SA? If so what do I nee
Actually I did it...
Unfortunatly I stoped doing it real quick.
You need to have perl installed and working then install sa through that, have
your mta call perl which calls sa etc... It took up 100% cpu cycles until the
message was processed, usually 10-20 seconds for a small message. I've added
I agree with this, I have an option that would allow me to accept all incoming
email. When it was active I had more spam incoming. When I deactivated it there
was a drop in the resource usage. I know this because my mail server is behind a
relay and the level in bounced email droped. The email wou
Never mind. I was trying to get spamc to accept the paramater when spamd needed
it instead. All is working well now.
Kevin Gagel wrote:
>
> I've got another problem here. (no surprise eh!)
> Now that I am relaying from my anti-virus scanner to the SpamAssassin scanner to
> my
I've got another problem here. (no surprise eh!)
Now that I am relaying from my anti-virus scanner to the SpamAssassin scanner to
my mail server, and it's working... I am getting a prolem with the headers being
corrupted. What I mean is that there is somehow an extra line feed being
attached. How
is the place to go to make
> site-wide changes.
>
> You could also edit the files in /usr/share/spammassassin, but that's
> probably not a good idea since they should be replaced when you upgrade.
>
> At 02:06 PM 7/16/2002 -0700, Kevin Gagel wrote:
> >Where exactly is the
Where exactly is the config file that spamassassin uses on a site wide
configuration?
I'm using root as the run as and spamd as a daimen. Spam is called via a script.
Spamd is loaded with the -x to prohibit user configs. What directory would the
site config be in?
--
Kev
$FILE
> tempfilename
I guess what I need is a perl script to take the value of $FILE and add a unique
identifier to it then pass the value and unique one to spamc as you suggested.
"Tony L. Svanstrom" wrote:
>
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 the voices made Kevin Gagel write:
>
> >
I'm trying to get SA setup on a linux server with my MTA. I can't get the marked
up messages passed back though. Here is what happens.
MTA creates a temp file. I'm allowed to do anything with this file, so I launch
spamc and send it to spamd via a pipe. Ie: spamc < tempfile. Here is where I
have
Your better off to ask this on [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list.
Several of us have done what you want.
Some of use have even offered to give it away.
Might save you some work...
Brad,
I'll leave you to answer the forked question...
Shane Hawrysh wrote:
>
> I've been writing a utility to integrat
Justin,
I've been trying to get some help setting up SA on a windows server. I was
finally able to get it integrated and working. But it messed up our incoming
mail. Some how an extra linefeed was feed into the email begining with the
first line. The result was that all mail readers interpret th
Subject: Re[2]: [SAtalk] SA doesn't do anything...
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 15:23:24 +1200
From: Support DMail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Kevin Gagel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTEC
SpamAssassin Talk List
My mistake. It does. My batch file was wrong.
New problem though. All email that do get put through and marked up end up with
extra line feeds in them. I know this is because *nix and the windows platform
handle them diffrently. What I don't know is if there is anything I
his slight windows specific
oddity and then we'll be off and running.
Kevin Gagel wrote:
>
> Yes, I thought that was the idea. However I realize now that is not what is
> happening (or that is not what is supposed to happen). According to the docs I
> must use the -P switch. Why? Becaus
rry on. Is this the ONLY way to have SA work with the -P
switch?
"Rose, Bobby" wrote:
>
> Are you expecting it to rewrite the file that you're pipeing?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Gagel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 12:
mail to the users mailbox)
I'm stumped as to how to proceed. Any suggestions?
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 08:52:51AM -0700, Kevin Gagel wrote:
> > Since the -P means to pipe the email through, and the examples show only a SDOUT
> > example with j
I am having the same problem as you. I have not had any success in soliciting
help either. I thought that my setup was to blame but I'm fairly confident that
it is some how SA that has the problem. I also think that it's the -P that is
responsible...
Since the -P means to pipe the email through,
I have implemented SA on a site wide configuration.
My scripts show that spam is being detected and loged but...
My email is not being marked up with the spamassassin details.
What I want is for the email to continue to the recipient with the marked up
spamassassin details.
How do I configure th
I've been having trouble getting sa to be useful. I've tried the batch file that
gets generated but if I don't use -P it just hangs and does nothing. I've tried
the .pl instead and ran it from there with the same result. I've traced the
problem to the setting for the mail spool directory. It seems
I'm new to perl. New to spamassassin.
I do have perl running ok on the server. In the spamassassin docs it gives me
the following commands to install.
perl -MCPAN -e shell
o conf prerequisites_policy ask
install Mail::SpamAssassin
This works well but nmake gives me errors.
30 matches
Mail list logo
