SpamAssassin Talk List

My mistake. It does. My batch file was wrong.

New problem though. All email that do get put through and marked up end up with
extra line feeds in them. I know this is because *nix and the windows platform
handle them diffrently. What I don't know is if there is anything I can do
about.

It has the side effect of throwing the whole message out of sync with a mail
reader. The mail reader interprets the message as being sent from noone and no
subject, yet looking at the body shows they are there. Here is a paste from one,
between the begin paste and end paste, after there is more to this message:
---BEGIN PASTE---
Message-ID: <md5:EE7C8ABC2F74046D7501C87306A5B205>
Received: from anti ([142.27.70.181]) by cnc.bc.ca ; Wed, 26 Jun 2002 15:12:16
-0800 gmt
X-Mozilla-Status: 8001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-UIDL: 1025129538.2496

Received: FROM hotmail.com BY anti ; Wed Jun 26 15:18:35 2002 -0700

Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;

         Wed, 26 Jun 2002 15:12:12 -0700

Received: from 14x.x27.7x.x51 by pv1fd.pav1.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;

        Wed, 26 Jun 2002 22:12:12 GMT

X-Originating-IP: [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]

From: "Kevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bcc: 

Subject: testagain

Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 15:12:12 -0700

Mime-Version: 1.0

Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed

Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jun 2002 22:12:12.0403 (UTC)
FILETIME=[85854430:01C21D5E]

X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0

        tests=none

        version=2.31

X-Spam-Level: 

X-DPOP: Version number supressed

X-UIDL: 1025129538.2496



test one more

Status: U


_________________________________________________________________

Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com



---END PASTE---
As you can see the headers are there and there are extra line spaces. only the
first four lines seem to be intact but they get added by the mail reader.

Is there a setting in SA that will cause it to treat crlf diffrently? Or an easy
way to report?

I should also note that I am having to use the -P < input > output to make SA
work on this because it is a windows 2000 server. SA can not run without piping
the message and replacing the original with the output.

Olivier Nicole wrote:
> 
> >the problem was my mail server software did not allow me to
> >do that kind of piping. Rather it gives me a process that
> 
> What strange software are you using then? I'd think most of them allow
> some sort of piping/external filtering.
> 
> Olivier

-- 
========================
Kevin W. Gagel
Network Administrator
College of New Caledonia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(250)562-2131 loc. 448
========================

--------------------------------
The College of New Caledonia    
Visit us at http://www.cnc.bc.ca
--------------------------------


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber Inc.
Don't miss the IM event of the season | Special offer for OSDN members! 
JabberConf 2002, Aug. 20-22, Keystone, CO http://www.jabberconf.com/osdn
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to