d downloading the source and making manually. I get the same
failure during 'make test'.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Landry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 7:34 PM
To: Jeff Funk
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Upgrade problem . . .
Did you install the Time::Hi
I'm trying upgrade on CPAN and I keep getting failed tests like below:
t/spamc_c_stdout_closed.spamd start failed: log: debug: Score set 0 chosen.
debug: Preloading modules with HOME=/tmp/spamd-57489-init
Use of inherited AUTOLOAD for non-method Time::HiRes::time() is deprecated at
../blib/li
We were having issues with
SA slowing to a crawl and messages backing up in the queue so I decided to try cgpsa
and see if the problem would go away. After getting it set up yesterday,
everything performed perfectly for about 16 hours and 55000 messages. Then,
all of a sudden, at around 9
We were having issues with SA slowing to a crawl and messages backing up
in the queue so I decided to try cgpsa and see if the problem would go
away. After getting it set up yesterday, everything performed perfectly
for about 16 hours and 55000 messages. Then, all of a sudden, at around
9am CDT,
I could donate some bandwidth to the cause. I've got a surplus of outbound bandwidth
. . .
-Original Message-
From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 12:25 PM
To: 'Jennifer Wheeler'
Cc: 'Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)'
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Too many ru
So what does the average person set for the threshold of largest message
scanned by SA. Right now I'm at 32768 bytes. How large is it safe to
go???
Jeffrey J Funk
Chief Technology Officer
Farin & Associates, Inc.
608.661.4240
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
So what does the average person set for the threshold of largest message
scanned by SA. Right now I'm at 32768 bytes. How large is it safe to
go???
Jeffrey J Funk
Chief Technology Officer
Farin & Associates, Inc.
608.661.4240
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
al Message-
From: David B Funk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 1:25 AM
To: Jeff Funk
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Any ideas
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Jeff Funk wrote:
> The header below is from an e-mail that seems to get through sa repe
Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0
Received: from bandoog.com ([209.83.8.50]) by mail.farin.com with Microsoft
SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329);
Thu, 18 Sep 2003 00:40:43 -0500
Received: from [218.75.22.22] (HELO 209.83.8.50)
by bandoog.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.3)
with SMTP id 132
Here's a header of an e-mail I just received. The F'word has been replaced with X's.
Isn't there a default rule in SA somewhere that would catch that? Seems like a pretty
obvious nasty to me . . . .
Subject: Naked victims being XX
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=6.6
tests=DAT
OK, then the question still begs an answer . . . how do I get the stuff out of Outlook
and into sa-learn???
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 4:45 PM
To: Jeff Funk; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Trouble training bayes
I'm sure this is a silly question, but it's one that I haven't been able
to find documentation on and has kept me from using the Bayes stuff in
SA. Does it matter whether the header info is included in the e-mail
when submitted to sa-learn? From what has been said in this thread, it
sounds like o
12 matches
Mail list logo
