> On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 08:32:48AM -0300, Derek Broughton wrote:
> > The one available from the sourceforge.net/projects/spamassassin page?
It
> > asks me for a userid & password. I don't mind helping you out with a
> > survey, but I'm not going through th
> I also created a survey to give us all a better sense of who's using
SpamAssassin.
> It's just 3 questions, all multiple choice :) -- if you have 3 seconds
while
> signing up for the announcements list, go ahead and click through the
survey
> too.
The one available from the sourceforge.net/proj
> On Tue, 7 May 2002, Derek Broughton wrote:
>
> > It's unlikely to be a truly false positive - ie, it may not be spam but
I
> > can pretty much guarantee you that he's trying to email you from an SMTP
> > server on his own, dial-up, link instead of via Earthlink
From: "Miles Fidelman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Tue, 7 May 2002, Doug Crompton wrote:
>
> > I don't know. I changed mine in the 50_scores file. It obviously works
> > there.
>
> I think I'll try that next.
>
> I was just hoping to avoid making changes in the rules files, to keep
> upgrading simp
Daniel Pittman wrote:
> On Tue, 7 May 2002, Gilles Nedostoupof wrote:
>
> I rewrote your message into RFC2822 compliance; please reply *below* the
> body text and *quote* existing text when replying. Your message was
> impossible to reply to as delivered. :/
>
Top quoting is ugly & evil, but ther
> Where is the data for KNOW_BAD DIALUPS stored? I am getting a false
> negative from a friend who uses earthlink.net and that pushes it over the
> top. I greped for a number of things in rules but did not find anything. I
> hesitate to eliminate the rule altogether but that might also be an
> opt
From: "Craig R Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Derek Broughton wrote:
>
> DB> From: "CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> DB> > they used to improve rules or just added the spam corpus?
> DB>
> DB> Aren't the
From: "Viraj Alankar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Now by being able to see this traffic, we can do some interesting things.
If
> anyone has played with dsniff, there are 2 tools in that package that come
to
> mind: mailsnarf and tcpkill :). For those that do not know, mailsnarf
> basically dumps out S
From: "CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > These should goto spamassassin-sightings, not spamassassin-talk (unless
> > you think there's a discussion in store for this spam.)
>
> What exactly happens to the emails that are sent to
spamassassin-sightings?
> I have sent alot of
Craig wrote:
> Well, I think that better than comparing the rounded number, we should
> instead compare the real numbers, and just round down instead.
> So 4.9 would be
> displayed as 4.9 not 5.0 -- it's less mathematically correct, but makes it
> clearer why 5.0 < 5.0 sometimes.
Which is fi
From: "Charlie Watts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Wed, 1 May 2002, Derek Broughton wrote:
> > _nothing_ beats Exim. Exim installation on a Debian system is almost
> > trivial. Spamassassin installation on top of Exim, and it wouldn't need
to
> > be De
> Might be worth doing the check on the rounded number, just to eliminate
> the visual confusion.
I wouldn't say _just_ to eliminate the visual confusion. If the header had
been:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.999 required=5.0
it would have been correct. If the header tells me the hit count wa
This looks strange - it hit my triggering limit exactly, and isn't
considered spam. Why?
--
Derek Broughton
--- Begin Message ---
BIZ and .INFO Available Here
Dear sir/madam,
The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers [ICANN] has recently approved
the addition of new exten
From: "Dave Strickler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Looks like SendMail uses Milter(s) to hook in...
> Looks like ProcMail has easy hooks...
>
> Anyone have a preference for ease of use / clean install / less
> headaches? The box it will run on will be dedicated to SA and nothing
> else.
_nothing_ beat
From: "Matt Sergeant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > They may also have the text "I need your advice on this" or some such
> > nonsense. The attachment is usually a .pif file that shows up with the
> > type "Audio/X-WAV" as below. SA does not catch it as spam. At least
not
> > with the stock setting
Bart wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Doug Crompton wrote:
>
> > The following message (headers below) was tagged as spam. It is not.
What
> > I don't understand is why does it say yahoo.com is a forged address and
> > via a tagged relay?
>
> SA says the yahoo.com address was forged because the From
> I've been using SA for about 2 months now and have been running with the
> default threshold of 5 hits.
>
> With the new version 2.20 I got a false positive with a newsletter
> I receive.
My very first hit with SA was on a subscribed newsletter, mostly caused by
CTYPE_JUST_HTML. Within a day I
Ken Causey wrote:
> I realize that most of the scores in SA were GA derived, and I agree
> that that seems like a very good technique. However, I have to wonder
> at the scores for forged recieved headers. Is there any case in which a
> "valid" email has forged recieved headers? Why don't thes
CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson wrote:
> No you can't. Q-S will only run spamc and doesn't block or quarantine any
> Spam messages. It has to be done further down the delivery pipe using
> maildrop or procmail.
> >
> > Maybe there's a way to do this in qmail-scanner which I use with
> > pamd? --
19 matches
Mail list logo
