Bart wrote: > On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Doug Crompton wrote: > > > The following message (headers below) was tagged as spam. It is not. What > > I don't understand is why does it say yahoo.com is a forged address and > > via a tagged relay? > > SA says the yahoo.com address was forged because the From: header is > yahoo.com but there is no yahoo.com machine mentioned in any of the > Received: headers.
Actually, it said FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD which seems pretty misleading. Shouldn't the rule, then, be FORGED_YAHOO_FROM? That seems to be what confused Doug (and certainly confused me :-) ). -- derek _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
