From: "Craig R Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Derek Broughton wrote: > > DB> From: "CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > DB> > they used to improve rules or just added the spam corpus? > DB> > DB> Aren't the two things synonymous? ;-) I'm sure that that is, at least, the > DB> intention. > > The sightings stuff mostly does not currently end up in the corpus, at least not > in an automated way. The trouble is there's no real way to know if the stuff
But that's not what I said. The corpus is used for the GA, right? So spams added to the corpus are used to improve the rules, though I guess there may be spams that are used to improve rules _without_ being added to the corpus, so it may not be entirely synonymous. "sightings" otoh might not be used for anything, as you said. _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
