Ken Causey wrote: > I realize that most of the scores in SA were GA derived, and I agree > that that seems like a very good technique. However, I have to wonder > at the scores for forged recieved headers. Is there any case in which a > "valid" email has forged recieved headers? Why don't these tests have > higher scores? I do realize that I can change the scores, and I may do > that, but I thought I would check and see if there was some logic or bit > of information that I'm missing.
I'd take that further. What's with all the negative GA scores? Some make enough sense that I'm willing to trust the GA rather than my own intuition (like COPYRIGHT_CLAIMED) but CASHCASHCASH has a -0.839 in my version (Debian Woody, so perhaps a little bit behind the cutting edge). -- derek _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
