Mitch (WebCob) wrote:
Your missing the case where the mail is not coming from a private network or
a nated server.
I experience this problem (as mentioned in the bug report) from roaming
users who are connecting through authenticated SMTP to their mail server,
and relaying to me. I'd have to trust
Chris Maher wrote:
Hello all,
Here's my scenario:
I've got a RH9 server with SA2.61-1 installed. The server is a gateway for a number of different email domains. company1.com, company2.net, company3.org. I've got the three companies in /etc/mail/access and the forwarding/relaying is working fi
Michael Smith wrote:
Hey all, I recently started experiencing a weird issue.
Upon upgrading to SA 2.61 and amavisd-new-20030616-p7,
SA is no longer checking my mail. I am using a
sendmail-milter setup. My log files simple shows:
Jan 6 13:44:35 gozer amavis[4809]: (XXWs89uW)
spam_scan: h
Peter SJF Bance wrote:
All,
[Hoping this gets through, and isn't blocked by SpamAssassin on another
server!!]
I've been trying to work this one out for a few days now - I run various
mailman lists, and recently all my mail has been rejected when I've
attempted to post to them. I use Sendmail, Am
Alexei Moulton wrote:
I am running exim 4.12 with exiscan and spamassassin 6.1
The list of TESTS in X-Spam-Report header never includes BAYES and also
the bayes score from _BAYES_ is always 0.5000. From this i gather that the
bayes database is not being used?
not sure exactly what spamassassin
Obantec Support wrote:
Hi All
RH8.0 with SA2.60 installed as sitewide.
Procmailrc is handling spam for all users and creates
~/.spamassassin/user_prefs ok.
Now 1 customer has decided he does not like spam filtered emails (cannot
please all).
tried |/usr/bin/spamassasin -x in procmailrc since i r
I use dialups.visi.com and dynablock.easynet.nl.
- Original Message -
From: "Marcio Merlone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "SA List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 9:30 AM
Subject: [SAtalk] What Dynamic IPs rbl list?
> Hello!
>
> I was wondering what rbl lists you guys
> On 2003-10-16, Brian Sneddon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you check the rule itself in 20_dnsbl_tests.cf you'll notice the
> > -notfirsthop part of the argument to check_rbl_txt(). This tells
> > SpamAssassin to check all hops except the first one for this match. As
a
>
> I wasn't even
> At 12:42 AM 10/3/03 -0400, Christopher M. Iarocci wrote:
> >Hi, I'm using SpamAssassin 2.60 being called through Amavisd-new.
Dynablock
> >(along with a few others) is scoring on lots of messages that it
shouldn't
> >because the first hop is a dial up. I put t
need to use the "eval:check_rbl_txt" option instead for this
particular RBL? I'm a little confused, any help would be appreciated,
thanks.
Christopher M. Iarocci
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.5
> >>this latest server I'm building
> >>requires blocking of email, not just filtering
> >
> >I used [1] for exim3 but there is also a help for exim4 [2].
> >
> >[1] http://dman.ddts.net/~dman/config_docs/exim3_spamassassin.html
> >[2] http://dman.ddts.net/~dman/config_docs/exim4_spamassassin.htm
Chris,
Will Postfix block email at the SMTP level if the email reaches a score I
specify, or at least block it from being delivered to the POP server that
sits behind it?
Chris
- Original Message -
From: "Covington, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Christophe
Will Postfix block email at the SMTP level if the email reaches a score I
specify, or at least block it from being delivered to the POP server that
sits behind it?
Chris
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.507 / Viru
Anybody have Exim and SA running as a SPAM filtering/blocking gateway that
would want to share their configs with me, and knowledge for that matter?
I'm a qmail person myself, but this latest server I'm building requires
blocking of email, not just filtering, and I was advised that EXIM was the
rig
,
the MTA needs to be able to block totally email that scores above a certain
amount in SpamAssassin. Thanks for your suggestions.
Christopher M. Iarocci
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.502 / Virus Database
> I have a Red Hat Linux 9 machine that has Perl 5.8 installed on it, and
Perl
> 5.8 on this machine looks deeply embedded to the core of the OS, based on
> the ton of dependencies when I do "rpm -e perl". I need to run
SpamAssassin
> on this machine, but the SpamAssassin docs highly recommends
>
> In my work, we have a lot of mail servers. My idea is put a spamassassin
> server where any mail server in my domain can connect to the server to
> analize spams.
>
> It is posible??
>
> Bye!
Yes.
Chris
---
This SF.Net email is spon
> Hi,
> I am using the sam module in Horde/IMP CVS version for spamassasin
> to work with the webinterface.
>
> It works great
>
> I just wanted to ask , can I blacklist an entire domain for a particular
> user in his spam settings (Web iterface)
>
blacklist_f
I'm running a Mandrake 9.0 machine, with qmail (as installed by LWQ.org) and
SA 2.55 site wide, using Bayes with auto learning enabled. The server is
just a gateway server, which then routes it's filtered email (Thank you VERY
much SpamAssassin!) to a POP server sitting behind it. The server behi
> I need help figuring something out.
>
> I'm managing email on a server in an inhouse, company
> environment. Many users on system, but all are using the
> system for company business, so basically we will have very
> similar spam vs. ham issues.
>
> I was frustrated because the autolearn Bayes
> I've been using Bayes and auto whitelisting for several weeks
> only, but on a site wide basis (i.e. spamc/spamd triggered from
> procmail from sendmail).
>
> I've been very happy with the bayes learner, but today got a
> pretty bad spam into one of the mailing lists I manage, here are
> some
I'm running a Mandrake 9.0 machine, with qmail (as installed by LWQ.org) and
SA 2.55 site wide, using Bayes with auto learning enabled. The server is
just a gateway server, which then routes it's filtered email (Thank you VERY
much SpamAssassin!) to a POP server sitting behind it. The server behi
> Jack,
>
> based on what you wrote, I added a "-m 2" option to my call of spamd, to
> limit the number of children to 2.
> This should solve at least my problem, since the default obviously was
> "unlimited". If that's wrong, could one of the developers or someone with
> more insight set us str
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am a newbie to spamassassin but managed to install
> it and am successfully running it right now. At my
> work place we have multiple servers on which we would
> like to install spamassassin to filter out SPAM. We do
> not have a centralised mail server where filtering is
>
> On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 04:49:55PM -0500, Ben M. VanWagner wrote:
> > What amazes me is that everytime some idiot does this.. everyone agrees
> > that the information in the email needs to be changed and then it never
is.
>
> Here's an idea. What about changing the default text used to say so
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 1:54 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] I hate SpamAssassin
> Why not let
> us have control of what happens at the PC level as opposed to the
> network level?
Probably because you'd co
26 matches
Mail list logo
